Thursday, May 28, 2020

DOCTOR WHORES, CORPORATE & ATTORNEY PIMPS, "CRYSTAL MESH", JENNIFER BANMILLER & ALICIA MUNDY


Lana C. Keeton
Med Device Expert LLC
Legal Consultant  .  Medical Device Expert  .  Expert Witness
© 2005 - 2020 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
Intellectual property of Lana C. Keeton
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
May 28, 2020


DOCTOR WHORES, 
CORPORATE PIMPS,
“CRYSTAL MESH”,
JENNIFER BANMILLER 
& ALICIA MUNDY

Doctors are paid whores pimped out by mesh companies (and lawyers). Doctor whores assault and brutalize women forcing a deadly weapon, surgical mesh, into their vaginas. They are not street dealers selling recreational drugs. Women are being legally raped. Women pay their own money to doctors and hospitals and insurance companies to be tortured by synthetic surgical mesh, cutting through their internal organs in the most sensitive parts of their bodies, their reproductive organs.

Just to set the record straight. Doctors are the whores. Corporations (and Lawyers) are the pimps. Women are the johns. Except these Doctor Whores commit vicious crimes by forcing dangerous objects into the vaginas of women, Trocars and Pelvic Mesh.

Genital mutilation is a crime against humanity. Synthetic Surgical Mesh is worse. The health and legal systems are corrupt beyond belief.

Nothing and no one stops this medical disaster, this debacle. It continues unabated because PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEYS, yes, PLAINTIFFS ATTORNEYS and DEFENSE ATTORNEYS protect MAJOR CORPORATIONS who intentionally and knowingly perpetuate the harm, aided and abetted by JANE AKRE.

MY OPINION OF “CRYSTAL MESH”, THE BOOK.

IT IS A LIE.

ALL EXISTING COPIES SHOULD BE BURNED BECAUSE JENNIFER BANMILLER AND ALICIA MUNDY HAVE GROSSLY MISCHARACTERIZED WOMEN and the FACTUAL HISTORY OF MESH.

Jennifer Banmiller and Alicia Mundy portray women as “Less Than” throughout the book.

1.      “Women are not capable of filling out adverse event reports at the FDA.”
Not true. Thousands and thousands of women have filed adverse event reports at the FDA for complications of synthetic surgical mesh for bladder suspension and pelvic organ prolapse repair.

2.      “Women are incapable of psychologically dealing with the serious physical injuries caused by surgically implanted mesh.” Not true.

3.      “There will never be bladder slings for men, because men would never allow it to happen to them.” Totally sexist and not true. Synthetic Surgical mesh bladder slings for men have been on the market since the early 2000’s.

4.      “Women in America did not start a movement against synthetic surgical mesh.” Not true.

5.      Women who are the original World Mesh Leaders are not even mentioned in the book.
a)      Lana Keeton, Truth in Medicine, United States, 2007
b)      Lorraine Evans, TVT-Meshed-Up-Mesh.org, United Kingdom, 2008
c)      Gayle Graham, South Africa, 2008
d)     Maria Smit & Dora de Wilde, MeshedUp.eu, Holland
e)      Carmel Berry & Charlotte Korte, MeshDownUnder.co.nz, New Zealand
f)       Elaine Holmes & Olive McIlroy, Scottish Mesh Survivors, Scotland
g)      Joanne Boon, Australia

6.      Kath Samson, covered in the book, started her group by stealing from Lorraine Evans. Kath Samson has harassed and denigrated many mesh injured women and she is reviled by many mesh injured women worldwide.

7.      Jane Akre, is a thief and a fraud and a disservice to all mesh injured women and men. She operates an illegal attorney referral service and writes stories that protect attorneys, not the women. A whore? My opinion, yes she is. Yet Alicia Mundy and Jennifer Banmiller thank Jane Akre at the beginning and at the end of the book.

Personally I am furious. This book denies my existence. This book eviscerates my work. This book is a disservice to me and to all mesh injured women worldwide fighting to stop the harm.

To my face Alicia Mundy told me on Tuesday, December 10, 2019 that my Motion to Recuse Judge Joseph R. Goodwin was not a strong argument. When did she become a legal expert? The fact I even filed the motion is a gigantic win against the corruption in the Multidistrict Litigations in West Virginia that has used and abused over 100,000 mesh injured women. Who else had the strength to go against this corrupt judge? Anyone else? No.

And Alicia Mundy told me on Tuesday, December 10, 2019 my testimony before the FDA Obgyn Panel meeting on February 12, 2019 was deficient because I mentioned the 14-15 mesh removal surgeries and the flesh eating bacteria I got from a Gynecare TVT bladder sling.

The FDA held the meeting on February 12, 2019 because of pressure I put on them by submitting 87,000 adverse event reports on September 5, 2018. 87,000 adverse event reports not submitted because their attorneys prohibited them from submitting them.

Alicia Mundy denigrated Barbara Lynn Melling’s testimony at the same meeting. Every single person has the right to stand up publicly before the FDA and tell their story. In any way they see fit. This is America.

Alicia Mundy is biased and prejudiced against mesh injured women. By default, Jennifer Banmiller is biased and prejudiced against mesh injured women as Banmiller PAID Mundy to write the book, admits it is a lie and has done nothing to remedy the NON FACTUAL BOOK “CRYSTAL MESH”.

Personally I AM A VICTOR, no matter what Alicia Mundy OR Jennifer Banmiller says or thinks, and I have told them both repeatedly NOT to characterize me as a victim. I AM NOT a victim. I own my destiny which GOD has given me and Jennifer Banmiller and Alicia Mundy do not define who I am.

Lana C. Keeton
Med Device Expert LLC
Legal Consultant  .  Medical Device Expert  .  Expert Witness
© 2005 - 2020 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
Intellectual property of Lana C. Keeton
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
May 28, 2020

Sunday, April 19, 2020

AMBULANCE CHASER BRIGADE... JANE AKRE, BEGGS, LANDERS AND ALL THE USUAL SUSPECTS! WHAT A SAD COMMENTARY ON THE ONGOING UNEQUAL JUSTICE FOR WOMEN IN THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA...

The lawsuit against Clark, Love, Hutson and Lee Murphy in U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Texas is a sad comment on the power of women to be properly represented by any law firm. 

Dear old Clayton A. Clark just pulled out his "let me screw you" playbook and accused Beggs, Landers of wrongdoing, which is not true. 

And the idiot Jane Akre has this ad posted as she dredges for any possible new plaintiff for Beggs, Landers so her lifestyle goes on unhindered by the fact that Jane Akre is A THIEF. Good luck with this crowd of AMBULANCE CHASERS. 



Tuesday, April 14, 2020

JUDGE JOSEPH R. GOODWIN & JUDGE DANIEL J. STACK STAND SHOULDER TO SHOULDER WITH THE LEGAL CARTEL: FRAUD IN WEST VIRGINIA & THE CORONA VIRUS


“THE DAILY DROP”
The Legal Cartel: Facts, Rumors & Innuendoes



THIS COURT HOUSE BELONGS TO THE MESH INJURED
PLAINTIFFS SEEKING JUSTICE!
by Lana C. Keeton
Med Device Expert LLC
Legal Consultant  .  Medical Device Expert
© 2005 – 2020  Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
Intellectual Property of Lana C. Keeton
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
Volume III  Issue 2, April 11, 2020


FRAUD IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
UNDETERRED BY THE FEDERAL APPEALS COURT
OR
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
BUT MOST LIKELY WILL NOT BE IGNORED BY THE
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

Form 211 (July 2018) Department of the Treasury –
Internal Revenue Service Application for Award for Original Information
OMB Number 1545-0409
Date Claim received
Claim number (completed by IRS)
Section A – Information About the Person or Business You Are Reporting

JUDGE JOSEPH R. GOODWIN and retired JUDGE DANIEL J. STACK STAND
SHOULDER TO SHOULDER WITH THE LEGAL CARTEL

The Public Corruption of the following attorneys and Judge Joseph R. Goodwin has

doomed thousands of Pelvic Mesh injured women to Unequal Justice under the Law sentencing

them to further brutalization by forced Pelvic Mesh removal in order to be compensated for

severe physical injuries from implantation of a “medical device”, the deadly petroleum waste

byproduct, polypropylene synthetic surgical mesh.

The nine members of the FCC are:
Chairperson Henry G. Garrard III (Blasingame, Burch, Garrard & Ashley)
Renee Baggett (Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz)
Riley L. Burnett, Jr. (Burnett Law Firm)
Thomas P. Cartmell (Wagstaff & Cartmell)
Clayton A. Clark (Clark, Love & Hutson)
Yvonne M. Flaherty (Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen)
Carl N. Frankovitch (Frankovitch, Anetakis, Colantonio & Simon)
William H. McKee, Jr.
Joseph F. Rice (Motley Rice)
and
Daniel J. Stack (Retired Circuit Judge, External Review Specialist)
Judge Joseph R. Goodwin, U.S. District Court, Southern Dist. West Virginia

     Civil litigation has become a criminal enterprise in the “Theft by Allocation of Common Benefit

Funds” conspiracy that includes, but is not limited to, Judge Goodwin, Judge Stack, William H.

McKee, Jr.(Judge Goodwin’s decades long friend), Henry Garrard III, Clayton Clark, Renee Baggett,

Riley Burnett, Tom Cartmell, Yvonne Flaherty, Carl Frankovitch and Joe Rice.

           
            April 11, 2020 marks a very sad anniversary. Exactly two years ago, 13,000 “Non-Revision

Plaintiffs”, code for #MESH Injured Women with implanted Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson Pelvic

Surgical Mesh who had not had it surgically removed, were unlawfully forced to end their lawsuits

unless and until
A SURGEON HAD CUT THEM OPEN TO REMOVE THE MESH.

With the stroke of his pen on PRETRIAL ORDER 293 on APRIL 11, 2018 by JUDGE JOSEPH

R. GOODWIN, 13,000 “Non-Revision Plaintiffs” were hung out to dry financially. These women

will likely never see a penny.  Collusion and conspiracy of the Plaintiff’s Attorney Steering

Committee with Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson and their own Defense Attorneys and JUDGE

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, illegally forced the 13,000 “Non-Revision Plaintiffs” to have medical

treatment as a prerequisite to be paid from the PELVIC MESH SETTLEMENT FUNDS of Ethicon /

Johnson & Johnson MDL 02327 violating their 4th Amendment Rights NOT TO HAVE 

MEDICAL TREATMENT.

The FINANCIAL COSTS of pelvic surgical mesh implantation is relatively low compared to the

exorbitant costs of pelvic surgical mesh removal, for the mesh injured patient most likely already in

FINANCIAL RUIN.

So now with the advent of the Corona Virus, Covid19, is FINANCIAL RUIN on the horizon for

the LEGAL CARTEL?  Could the LEGAL CARTEL’S FATE be just like Bernie Madoff when the

financial crisis hit in 2008 and he was sucked down the drain along with it. Madoff’s Ponzi scheme

began to unravel in the fall of 2008, when the general market downturn accelerated.

IS CORONA VIRUS “BERNIE MADOFF’S FATE” TO THE LEGAL CARTEL?

Back room deals for Plaintiff’s Attorneys need a pipeline of new plaintiffs through new

Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) and/or Class Actions perpetually to keep the funds coming to pay for

the next great MDL/Class Action. Not going to be easy to maintain when the Federal Court System

is shut down for Corona Virus.  

Instead of meeting in those back rooms when they travel to Robert C. Byrd U.S. Courthouse in

Charleston, WV, Plaintiff’s Attorneys are now sitting at their desks staring at their computer monitors

just like the #MESH Injured Men & Women they have thrown under the bus.

Financial ruin for some plaintiff and defense attorney firms? Very likely. Cause Judge Goodwin

can not “fix” the Corona Virus with a stroke of his pen. Below quoted cuts to Partner pay are just the

beginning. How many more are to come? Sitting in that stunningly beautiful legal firm office, the rent

goes on but certainly not all the billions of dollars of settlement money typically in the pipeline. 



BREAKING: Cadwalader Cuts Pay Across The Firm To Weather Pandemic By Aebra Coe Law360 (March 31, 2020, 11:42 AM EDT) - Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP’s leadership announced Tuesday that the law firm is pausing partner compensation distributions and reducing associate and senior administrative staff pay by 25% in response to the economic uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic.
In a firmwide letter to staff obtained by Law360, Cadwalader managing partner Pat Quinn explained that the law firm is reducing pay across the firm in an effort to proactively address the potential economic impacts the pandemic will have so that it can avoid layoffs down the road
Reed Smith Slows Partner Pay Over COVID-19 Concerns By Aebra Coe  Law360 (March 30, 2020, 5:23 PM EDT) -- Reed Smith LLP has slowed partner cash distributions as it takes a "fiscally conservative" approach to managing the potential economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, a firm spokesperson said on Monday.

While some law firms in the United States have cut staff in response to the crisis, a spokesperson for Reed Smith reported that it is looking to its partners to help weather the precarious economic situation the world now faces as businesses close to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus.
MY PERSONAL OPINION –
THE MASSIVE PELVIC MESH MDL’S IN WEST VIRGINIA
ARE and HAVE BEEN A DISASTER.
1.      Outright Theft from Plaintiffs by Forced Consent to Dismissal Without Prejudice pursuant to Pretrial Order 293, Ethicon MDL 02327.
2.      Violation of Plaintiff’s Rights to Due Process under the 5th and/or 14th Amendments
3.      Potential Mental Disorders of Plaintiff’s Attorneys in Power over all the Pelvic Mesh MDL’s Non-Steering Committee Plaintiffs Attorneys.
4.      Rampant Willful Blindness, a criminal state of mind as defined by the Supreme Court,  throughout the Multidistrict Litigations in the Federal Court System has drawn the attention of the U.S. House of Representatives, who passed HR 985 in February of 2017.    And the U.S. Senate where Senator Charles Grassley introduced legislation S. 2815 To Increase Transparency and Oversight of 3rd Party Litigation Funding, on May 10, 2018.
And the Department of Justice filing charges on May 24, 2019 against “Wesley Blake Barber, 49, of Detroit, Michigan, the owner of Surgical Assistance Inc. and Medical Funding Consultants LLC, and Christopher Walker, M.D., 49, of Orlando, Florida, and owner of MedSurg Holdings LLC, in an indictment filed in the Eastern District of New York with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, three counts of wire fraud, one count of conspiracy to violate the Travel Act and one count of violating the Travel Act.
5.      Gaslighting is used to manipulate Mesh Injured Plaintiff Clients, who are isolated, warned not to communicate anything to anyone about their lawsuit and easily abused by their own attorney because of their lack of knowledge of the law.
Gaslighting is “a form of manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or members of a group, hoping to make targets question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, it attempts to destabilize the target and delegitimize the target’s belief.”
Usage: “Sociopaths and narcissists frequently use gaslighting tactics. Sociopaths consistently transgress social mores, break laws, and exploit others, but typically also are convincing liars, sometimes charming ones, who consistently deny wrongdoing.” Sound familiar?
6.      Outright Theft of Plaintiffs Settlement Money by Attorneys Manipulation and Abuse of  Qualified Settlement Funds under IRS 468 B where there is no forensic accounting.
7.      Double dipping of cases? Are settlements paid by Defendants to Plaintiffs Attorneys, who don’t equitably distribute those IRS 468 B settlement funds to their own Plaintiff Clients, then placed on the docket again? QSF’s are ripe for Plaintiff Abuse.

It is a tragic state of affairs when trust is placed in the laws of the United States and in our Court System and in judges and in attorneys who violate their positions and/or their fiduciary duty to prey on innocent injured Plaintiff Clients.

Lana C. Keeton
© 2005 – 2020 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
Intellectual Property of Lana C. Keeton.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Med Device Expert LLC
Legal Consultant . Expert Witness . Device Expert . Patient Advocate
901 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3-423, Miami Beach, FL 33139
Truth in Medicine June 24, 2008 The beginning…
@all rights reserved to Lana C. Keeton

Facebook:  LANA KEETON  and  L.C. KEETON   Twitter:    @PlaintiffPower1
Volume III  Issue 2, April 11, 2020
© 2005-2020 all rights reserved Lana C. Keeton  -  Intellectual Property of Lana C. Keeton
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
901 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3-423, Miami Beach, FL 33139
305.671.9331 phone  .  800.509.9917 fax  .  305.342.8002 cell phone

Wednesday, January 22, 2020

LEGAL RAPE IN #MESH MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION? SEEMS SO IN PRETRIAL ORDER 293, SIGNED AND AUTHORIZED BY JUDGE JOSPEH R. GOODWIN, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

by Lana C. Keeton
Med Device Expert LLC
Legal Consultant  .  Medical Device Expert
© 2005 – 2020  Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
Intellectual Property of Lana C. Keeton
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
Volume III  Issue 1 January 22, 2020

LEGAL RAPE IN #MESH MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION?
ASK JUDGE GOODWIN.
 HE SIGNED THE ORDER. 

Judge Joseph R. Goodwin 

SEEMS SO IN PRETRIAL ORDER 293, SIGNED AND AUTHORIZED BY
JUDGE JOSPEH R. GOODWIN,
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST 
VIRGINIA APRIL 11, 2018 ETHICON MDL-2327

 AND ASK HENRY GILBERT GARRARD III, CLAYTON CLARK, SCOTT LOVE, SHELLEY HUTSON, BRYAN AYLSTOCK, TOM CARTMELL, JOE RICE, FRED THOMPSON, JONATHAN ORENT, MARK MUELLER...THEY KNOW WHAT THEY DID!

MY OPINION: PRETRIAL ORDER 293 = LEGAL RAPE

PLAINTIFFS ATTORNEY STEERING COMMITTEE
MAKES PELVIC SURGICAL MESH REMOVAL A REQUIREMENT TO BE PAID FROM THE PELVIC MESH SETTLEMENT FUNDS OF ETHICON/JOHNSON & JOHNSON,
MDL 02327 U.S. DISTRICT COURT, S.D. W.VA. under the authority of
JUDGE JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, PRETRIAL ORDER 293, APRIL 11, 2018

PELVIC SURGICAL MESH REMOVAL IS A STRAWMAN
It is a COLLABORATION of Plaintiff & Corporate Defense Attorneys
to qualify to MOVE MONEY to THEMSELVES through a
IRS 468B QUALIFIED SETTLEMENT FUND.

Synthetic Polypropylene Pelvic Surgical Mesh is a permanently implanted medical device.
It is NOT intended to be REMOVED.

PELVIC SURGICAL MESH REMOVAL IS A STRAWMAN!
30 REASONS WHY!
  1. No informed consent exists for any Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson pelvic surgical mesh to be implanted into any human.
  2. Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson pelvic surgical mesh implants are fraudulently on the market because Ethicon/J&J would only pay Dr. Ulf Ulmsten for clinical trials he performed pursuant to a written contract. Dr. Ulmsten signed the contract on February 13, 1997 agreeing all clinical trials would have good outcomes.
  3. There is no Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson protocol for removal of the pelvic surgical mesh in the instructions for use (IFU).
  4. There is no protocol for locating the Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson permanently implanted pelvic surgical mesh inside the body in the instructions for use (IFU).
  5. There is no known protocol recommended for pelvic surgical mesh removal by professional medical societies.
  6. Any and all pelvic surgical mesh removals are fishing expeditions and consequently, experimental surgical procedures.
  7. There are only a handful of qualified skilled surgeons in the U.S. who will attempt to do the surgical removal of pelvic mesh. Women travel from other countries for pelvic surgical mesh removal surgery in the U.S. because pelvic surgical mesh removal surgery is unavailable in their own countries.
  8. Insurance Companies deny coverage because the surgical mesh removal procedures are experimental.
  9. If the mesh injured patient does have insurance, will it pay for removal?
  10. Does the surgeon, if able to remove pelvic surgical mesh, accept that insurance?
  11. Mayo Clinic has a stated policy they will not treat pelvic mesh injuries if the woman patient is engaged in a lawsuit.
  12. The success and/or failure of pelvic surgical mesh removal depends on the skill of the surgeon and the overall health of each patient. Pelvic surgical mesh removal does not leave the patient uninjured because every time mesh is removed, it includes removing the patient’s own pelvic tissue which has grown into the interstices of the pelvic surgical mesh. Removing pelvic surgical mesh from the vagina is like cutting gum from hair.
  13. The constant inflammation from ongoing internal scarring is a permanent injury.
  14. Constant inflammation leads to autoimmune and other serious, potentially fatal diseases.
  15. Inflammation never ends as macrophages try to remove the polypropylene foreign body from the body.
  16. Macrophages develop into foreign body giant cells that try to digest and/or eject the pelvic surgical mesh from the body. It is impossible because of the size of the mesh itself.
  1. Small particles fall off the discontinuous loops of the edges of the pelvic surgical mesh. The particles are moved through the body in an effort to expel them from the body, exiting through the skin of all parts of the body.
  2. Most surgeons are not qualified to surgically remove surgical mesh.
  3. Most surgeons will not attempt surgical removal of mesh.
  4. As the native pelvic tissue weakens with the age of the patient, the surgical mesh does not weaken. Surgical mesh consequently moves through the body without any deterrent from the body’s own tissues.
  5. Deadly, life threatening infections from biofilms on the polypropylene surgical mesh that are antibiotic resistant, kill women over time.
  6. PTSD post traumatic stress disorder
  7. Inability to urinate
  8. Inability to defecate
  9. Inability to have sex
  10. Can not work
  11. Can not walk
  12. PAINFUL in office trimmings of delicate pelvic tissue to remove pieces & parts of pelvic surgical mesh without anesthesia are recommended by the Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson so pelvic surgical mesh removals will not be counted as a surgical procedure in the hospital.
  13. ANY pelvic surgical mesh removal removes healthy pelvic and/or vaginal tissue that has grown into the interstices of the mesh causing additional injury(ies) to the already existing injury(ies) from initial implantation.
  14.  The FINANCIAL COSTS of pelvic surgical mesh implantation is relatively low compared to the exorbitant costs of pelvic surgical mesh removal, frequently leaving the mesh injured patient in financial ruin.
DID ETHICON MDL 02327 WEST VIRGINIA PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEYS STEERING COMMITTEE MAKE ANY OBJECTION TO RITUAL MESH REMOVAL MUTILATION OF 13,000 WOMEN ORDERED BY JUDGE JOSEPH GOODWIN PTO 293 APRIL 11, 2018?


WILL CORRUPT PLAINTIFFS ATTORNEYS BE THE
DEATH OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION?
Why do I ask these questions?

Because of various civil lawsuits against Pelvic Mesh Plaintiff’s Attorneys, CLAYTON CLARK, SCOTT LOVE and SHELLEY HUTSON, CLARK, LOVE HUTSON alleging legal malpractice and criminal indictments for fraud against a Urogynecologist, DR. CHRISTOPHER WALKER, Orlando, Florida, and a Medical Funder, WESLEY BLAKE BARBER, Detroit, Michigan by the Department of Justice.

Very Serious Stuff.

MY PERSONAL OPINION –
THE MASSIVE PELVIC MESH MDL’S HAVE BECOME A DISASTER.
1.      Outright Theft from Plaintiffs by Forced Consent to Dismissal Without Prejudice pursuant to Pretrial Order 293, Ethicon MDL 02327.
2.      Violation of Plaintiff’s Rights to Due Process under the 5th and/or 14th Amendments
3.      Potential Mental Disorders of Plaintiff’s Attorneys in Power over all the Pelvic Mesh MDL’s Non-Steering Committee Plaintiffs Attorneys.
4.      Rampant Willful Blindness, a criminal state of mind as defined by the Supreme Court,  throughout the Multidistrict Litigations in the Federal Court System has drawn the attention of the U.S. House of Representatives, who passed HR 985 in February of 2017.    And the U.S. Senate where Senator Charles Grassley introduced legislation S. 2815 To Increase Transparency and Oversight of 3rd Party Litigation Funding, on May 10, 2018.
And the Department of Justice filing charges on May 24, 2019 against “Wesley Blake Barber, 49, of Detroit, Michigan, the owner of Surgical Assistance Inc. and Medical Funding Consultants LLC, and Christopher Walker, M.D., 49, of Orlando, Florida, and owner of MedSurg Holdings LLC, in an indictment filed in the Eastern District of New York with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, three counts of wire fraud, one count of conspiracy to violate the Travel Act and one count of violating the Travel Act.
5.      Gaslightingis used to manipulate Mesh Injured Plaintiff Clients, who are isolated, warned not to communicate anything to anyone about their lawsuit and easily abused by their own attorney because of their lack of knowledge of the law. Gaslighting is “a form of manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or members of a group, hoping to make targets question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, it attempts to destabilize the target and delegitimize the target’s belief.”
Usage: “Sociopaths and narcissists frequently use gaslighting tactics. Sociopaths consistently transgress social mores, break laws, and exploit others, but typically also are convincing liars, sometimes charming ones, who consistently deny wrongdoing.”
6.      Outright Theft of Plaintiffs Settlement Money by Attorneys Manipulation and Abuse of  Qualified Settlement Funds under IRS 468 B where there is no forensic accounting.
7.      Double dipping of cases. Are settlements paid by Defendants to Plaintiffs Attorneys, who don’t equitably distribute those IRS 468 B settlement funds to their own Plaintiff Clients, then placing the very same case on the docket again? QSF’s are ripe for Plaintiff Abuse.



MARK R. MUELLER, left, MUELLER LAW, 
AUSTIN, TX, and HENRY GILBERT GARRARD III,                                             right, BLASINGAME, BURCH, GARRARD & 
ASHLEY PC, ATHENS, GA



      










It is a tragic state of affairs when trust is placed in the laws of the United States and in our Court System and in attorneys who violate their fiduciary duty to prey on innocent injured Plaintiff Clients. Fortunately some Attorneys are now filing legal malpractice lawsuits against those Attorneys exposing those who abused their very own Plaintiff Clients, in State and Federal Court. 
Regards,
Lana C. Keeton
© 2005 – 2020 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
Intellectual Property of Lana C. Keeton.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Med Device Expert LLC
Legal Consultant . Expert Witness . Device Expert . Patient Advocate
901 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3-423, Miami Beach, FL 33139

THIS COURT HOUSE BELONGS TO THE INJURED PLAINTIFFS SEEKING JUSTICE!