Tuesday, February 28, 2017

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT V. WOMEN: FUNDING AND FEEDING THE UNIVERSITIES WITH YOUR PELVIS! by LANA C. KEETON written on MAY 21, 2013



THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT VS. WOMEN:
FUNDING AND FEEDING THE UNIVERSITIES WITH YOUR PELVIS!
By LANA C. KEETON - MAY 21, 2013

            Women are being maimed and tortured every single day because the federal government is feeding and funding the universities with our beautiful, precious bodies.
For almost 12 years now, I believed I was horribly injured because of corporate greed and the evil humans who ran them. The revelation I had today belongs in the headlines along with the IRS scandal, the DOJ attack on our 1st amendment rights at the AP and the State Department failings in Benghazi that killed 4 brave Americans serving their country in Libya.

The ultimate betrayal: the government that is supposed to protect you is preying on you.

            The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Center for Devices and Radiologic Health (CDRH) The Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN), created and funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), and its Gynecologic Health and Disease Branch (GHDB) work together to keep a steady flow of humans moving through the healthcare system by funding clinical trials at universities and hospitals (with your hard earned tax dollars). And, of course, device and drug companies are their willing accomplices.

God forbid you should be healthy. They would all be out of their jobs. They do not want you to be well. (We’re in trouble.)  


WHERE IS THE FUNDING FOR THE PATIENT HARM CAUSED BY GOVERNMENT HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION?

            It does not exist. Walk out of a hospital harmed by the “healthcare” provided and you are on your own. Sorry. You are not only permanently injured and out of a job, you are out of a life. There is no cavalry coming to the rescue.

            It’s not the lack of health insurance that hobbles Americans harmed by the system. It is the physical harm itself that ruins lives. Healthy people can work, support their families, care for themselves and participate in society.

            You are the by-product of a system run amuck. Government makes the laws which protect the doctors, hospitals, corporations and health insurance companies. What they do not protect is YOU, the patient.

So now look at this.

                  Pelvic Organ Prolapse

            Pelvic organ prolapse occurs when pelvic muscles and tissues can no longer support one or more of the pelvic organs, causing them to protrude or bulge through the vaginal canal. This protrusion may be uncomfortable, making physical activity difficult and interfering with sexual activity.

            Recent research suggests that 3.3 million women in the United States have had pelvic organ prolapse. Because of a possible association with aging, this number is expected to rise to 4.9 million by 2050. This increase highlights a public health        need for safe and effective treatments for pelvic organ prolapse. NICHD-     supported research on surgical approaches aims to better understand the long- term risks and benefits of these treatments for the condition.

            What will it matter? When these trials are done the women will all be dead.

            Pelvic organ prolapse is a key area of study for the NICHD-supported  Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN), supported through the NICHD’s Gynecological Health and Disease Branch (GHDB), within the Division of Extramural Research. Through its eight clinical centers and a Data Coordinating Center, the PFDN carries out important studies to help advance clinical care and improve our understanding of pelvic organ prolapse and other        PFDs, including their causes, their mechanisms, their treatments, and ways to possibly prevent them. Since the Network launched in 2001, more than 200 doctors, nurses, and researchers have joined with more than 4,000 women in    studies on PFDs. This ongoing partnership between researchers and patients is     critical to the PFDN’s success.
           

IS THIS SEXUAL ABUSE OF, AND SEXUAL DISCRIMINATION AGAINST, WOMEN? Not exactly sure but it certainly seems like it to me.
For me personally, I have an answer to a question I have been asking myself for almost 12 years.
How could any surgeon EVER violate a woman’s pelvis with trocars that look like meat hooks and then insert synthetic surgical mesh, a petroleum waste byproduct, through the most private, precious, life-giving part of a woman’s body?

Answer: Group think, crowd mentality, compliments of your government funded clinical trials at prominent hospitals and universities. They have to feed the system or they are all out of a job.

So each and every one of us mesh injured patients no longer has a life, at least not the beautiful one we had before a surgeon implanted the evil that is mesh.


GHDB…..Does that stand for GOD HELP the DAMN BASTARDS? Cause for sure they are all going to hell.

Thursday, February 16, 2017

STOP THE EVIL THAT IS MESH! LANA C. KEETON filing AMICUS CURAE BRIEF in HUSKEY V. ETHICON CASE NO. 15-2118 4th CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS



LANA C. KEETON filing Amicus Curae Brief in 
HUSKEY V. ETHICON
Petition for Re-Hearing in 
4th Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 15-2118

Please support my work to stop the EVIL that is MESH!

Dear Meshie Friends,

I personally am petitioning the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals to file an Amicus Curae brief to stop Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson in their petition for re-hearing of the Huskey v. Ethicon Case No. 15-2118. This is serious and affects all cases filed in the Transvaginal MDL’s in the Southern District of West Virginia before Judge Joseph Goodwin. Ethicon’s Petition is attached. I have personal knowledge and legal expertise to debunk their position, related to the FDA.

1.      1.       The prolene suture is not the same as the heavyweight prolene mesh used in the TVT-O.

2.      2.       The FDA did not hold its Ob-Gyn Panel meeting September 8-9, 2011 because of lawsuits. Truth in Medicine and my meetings with the FDA presenting scientific evidence of the complications of Polypropylene mesh, in addition to the over 6,000 adverse events filed by mesh injured women, precipitated the meeting and the warnings issued July 13, 2011.

3.     3.      Ethicon completely misrepresents the FDA’s 510(k) PreMarket Notification clearance process. I testified before the Institute of Medicine multiple times in 2010 and am fully aware of the actual legal process.

4.      4.       An FDA employee involved in the clearance of many of Ethicon’s mesh products has also worked for, and been paid by, Ethicon for over 20 years. I have absolute proof of this.

For your information:
1.       Amicus Curiae. Latin for "friend of the court." Frequently, a person or group who is not a party to a lawsuit, but has a strong interest in the matter, will petition the court for permission to submit a brief in the action with the intent of influencing the court's decision.

The situation most often noted in the press is when an advocacy group files a brief in a case before an appellate court to which it is not a litigant. Appellate cases are normally limited to the factual record and arguments coming from the lower court case under appeal; attorneys focus on the facts and arguments most favorable to their clients. Where a case may have broader implications, amicus curiae briefs are a way to introduce those concerns, so that the possibly broad legal effects of court decisions will not depend solely on the parties directly involved in the case.

I need your financial support to do this work. 10 years ago when I created Medical Mesh Device Action Center, I was 59. Today I am 69. 

Please go to my website, www.lanakeeton.com  home page to make a donation using paypal (can also use credit/debit card from the paypal button) to my work which has been totally financed by myself for over 10 years. 

I need your financial support to help hundreds of thousands of women worldwide already injured and to stop the ongoing widespread use of a mesh product that mutilates women internally.

Together we will defeat the EVIL that is mesh. God bless you all!

Yours truly,
Lana C. Keeton
© 2005 - 2017 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved. 
Peace be with You.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Med Device Expert LLC
Device Expert . Legal Consultant . Patient Advocate
1602 Alton Road, #423, Miami Beach, FL 33139

305-671-9331 phone . 800-509-9917 fax
786-566-7780 . 305-342-8002 cell phones


Tuesday, February 14, 2017

ATRIUM C-QUR HERNIA MESH LAWSUITS: THE LATEST MESH MADNESS IN MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION IN NEW HAMPSHIRE


IGNORE ALL THE LATEST ATRIUM C-QUR AND ETHICON PHYSIOMESH HERNIA MESH ATTORNEY ADS!

THEY ARE DESIGNED TO USE THE PAIN AND SUFFERING OF MESH INJURED PATIENTS TO PUT $$ MILLIONS, IF NOT $$BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THE ATTORNEYS POCKETS!

MULTI DISTRICT LITIGATION and MASS TORTS are an attorney's dream. It may take millions of dollars to prosecute but with thousands and thousands of injured plaintiffs in the pools, the Return on Investment is spectacular.

Defense Attorneys have boiler plate defenses they have honed over the years. They fight tooth and nail and DON'T PAY until the absolute end of the presiding judge's patience.

CONFIDENTIALITY REIGNS!

No INJURED PLAINTIFF will ever know what happens as the years drag by, their medical needs grow, they lose their jobs, their homes, their families, their friends. They lose EVERYTHING!

JUST ASK THE WOMEN IN THE TRANSVAGINAL MESH LITIGATION, OVER 100,000 WOMEN.

HORRIBLY, PERMANENTLY INJURED WOMEN WERE PAID AN AVERAGE OF $40,000.00. AFTER SUBROGATED MEDICAL EXPENSES, 40% + 5% ATTORNEY FEES, MAYBE THEY GET $5-10,000.00.

THE ATTORNEYS...THE PLAINTIFF'S STEERING COMMITTEE...A VERY SMALL GROUP OF LAW FIRMS?

MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THEIR POCKETS.

WHO IS SPENDING THOSE MILLIONS?

ASK HENRY GARRARD III, CO-LEAD COUNSEL WITH FRED THOMPSON AND BRYAN AYLSTOCK, WHOSE PHILOSOPHY IS "DON'T KILL THE COMPANY!"

THEY KEEP THE COMPANIES ALIVE TO MAKE MILLIONS AND MILLIONS MORE ATTORNEY FEES, WHILE DRAGGING THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS MORE INJURED PATIENTS THROUGH AN UNCARING COURT SYSTEM.

So the giant money making MULTI DISTRICT LITIGATION MACHINE grinds on, protecting the profits of the companies, the jobs of the doctors and the multimillion dollar incomes of ALL the attorneys, plaintiff and defense alike.

MASS TORTS ARE NOT MADE PERFECT FOR THE INJURED PLAINTIFFS!

Thursday, December 29, 2016

GOOD MORNING GOD! THANK YOU FOR STOPPING THE MASSIVE HARM TO WOMEN WORLDWIDE! THE CARNAGE HAS TO STOP!


WHO IS PROTECTING WOMEN FROM SURGICAL HARM 
BY DOCTORS IMPLANTING MESH?

Last I checked, NO ONE!

Not the FDA. Not Hospitals. Not Doctors. Not Medical Device Manufacturers. Not Attorneys.

If you as a woman have surgery for bladder suspension, pelvic organ prolapse, hysterectomy, 

FOR SURE YOU WILL BE HARMED!

HYSTERECTOMY IS PROMOTED by JOHNSON & JOHNSON   +Johnson & Johnson and ETHICON INC +Ethicon Inc. through Kathy Kelly and her Hyster Sisters commercial website, a company Ethicon has paid for years to drive women to their own website to their paid for doctors who use J&J/Ethicon products. 

Hysterectomy sets you up for pelvic organ prolapse and a myriad of complications that will keep you in the doctors office the rest of your life seeking treatment for the problems caused by hysterectomy. 

HYSTERECTOMY is an old wives tale PROMOTED BY J&J/ETHICON! DON'T HAVE ONE. YOU WILL REGRET IT. 

Don't sign up for the Hyster Sisters website and 
become a stat that pays Kathy Kelly very, very well 
to influence you to be used and abused by 
Major Drug & Device Companies! 

Kathy Kelley
Hyster Sisters, Inc
2436 S. I-35 E. Ste. 376-184
Denton, Texas 76205
kathy@hystersisters.com


POSTED ON HER SITE TO GET ADVERTISERS!
Website Stats:
Threads: 591,714
Posts: 4,770,363
Members: 425,587
Women: 95%
Ages: 25-60
Uniques: 600K pm
Page Views: 2.7-3.0 mil pm

Here's the Link:
http://www.hystersisters.com/vb2/view_advertisingpolicy.htm

DON'T SIGN UP FOR HYSTER SISTERS!

DON'T BE A PAWN IN THE FAKE HELP SITES!



Wednesday, October 19, 2016

COLLUSION OR COINCIDENCE? PLAINTIFF ATTORNEYS PROTECTING THE SYSTEM, NOT THE PLAINTIFFS? ANTIQUATED ABDOMINAL SACRAL COLPOPEXY ATTACHING THE VAGINA TO THE SPINE WITH POLYPROPYLENE SURGICAL MESH PROTECTED IN A COURT OF LAW AND DOCTORS CAN NOT BE SUED FOR THE HARM THEY CAUSE WOMEN. HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?





1.       Plaintiff Attorneys used an anemic trial strategy despite significant scientific expert evidence and knowledge to the contrary. Ambiguity remains. Hundreds of thousands of women are at risk from unsafe surgical procedures using synthetic surgical mesh in the female pelvis and reproductive system for serious permanent disabling injuries.

2.       Plaintiff Attorneys did not integrate all the causes of the harm from transvaginal mesh procedures in their strategy. The procedure, synthetic surgical mesh and trocar combined in the female pelvis and reproductive system are catastrophic along with comorbidities, age, concomitant procedures, again catastrophic.

3.       The Trial Strategy used was a limited concept of pore size which is difficult to prove and does not integrate the myriad physical and chemical properties of polypropylene synthetic surgical mesh and wound healing, critical to the understanding of mesh injury. Most important physical property: the polypropylene synthetic surgical mesh shrinks itself due to inherent manufacturing defects.

 

Synthetic Surgical Mesh remains on the market. Why?

 

1.       Plaintiff Attorneys,

2.       the American Urogynecological Society (AUGS)

3.       the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG)

4.       Doctors such as Dr. John Miklos and Dr. G. Willy Davila

5.       Hospitals such as Cleveland Clinic and the Mayo Clinic

6.       the United States Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (FDA’s CDRH)

7.       the director of the CDRH, Dr. Jeffrey Shuren, and David Krause, and other top officials at the FDA and

8.       Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon

Kept mesh on the market by a series of events.

 

The events listed below culminated in plaintiff’s attorneys proving abdominal sacral colpopexy was a better, safer alternative procedure to Pleivc Organ Prolapse repair through the vagina in bellwether trials in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia.
 

January 2012: The FDA’s CDRH issues 522 orders to 33 companies for 99 products they must begin clinical trials testing their synthetic surgical mesh products for safety and efficacy.
April 2012: Dr. John Miklos and Dr. Robert Moore hold doctor conference in Atlanta. Henry Garrard III is only attorney speaker on the agenda. Topic of speech, how doctors can avoid legal liability when implanting mesh
 
April 12, 2012 Mass Torts Made Perfect Panel         
Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy recommended
Pelvic Mesh: How to Represent the Victims
Robert Price, Levin Papantonio Thomas Mitchell Rafferty & Proctor
Amy Eskin, Hersh & Hersh
Henry Garrard, Blasingame Burch Garrard Ashley
Lana Keeton, Truth in Medicine
 
April 27, 2012 Lana Keeton sends letter to all Plaintiff’s Attorneys in the MultiDistrict Litigation warning of the significant dangers of Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy including clinical trials
 
 
May 2012 Johnson and Johnson’s Ethicon will stop selling 5 of their transvaginal mesh products. Only the TVT Secur was removed and the rest of the TVT bladder sling meshes remained on the market.
GYNECARE ProliftTM Pelvic Floor Repair System
GYNECARE Prolift +MTM Pelvic Floor Repair System
GYNECARE ProsimaTM Pelvic Floor Repair System
GYNECARE GYNEMESH MTM Partially Absorbable Mesh
GYNECARE TVT SecurTM System (not all TVT products)
Ethicon also notified FDA's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics of their intention to make a labeling change to the Indication for Use for GYNECARE GYNEMESH PS Nonabsorbable PROLENE Soft Mesh indicating it for abdominal (open or laparoscopic) use only.
 
(ABDOMINAL SACRAL COLPOPEXY!)
With approval of the labeling change by the FDA, the 522 orders for their products were placed on hold and eventually  terminated since the orders were applicable to vaginally placed POP mesh products only. Sales continued in the US and globally under the then current indication until regulatory approval of the labeling change was obtained in each country.
June 2012: Johnson and Johnson’s Ethicon send letter to Judge Joseph Goodwin they are removing 5 products from market
 
September 2012: The applied for approval of label changes for indication for use to Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy was eventually signed by Dr. Ben Fisher at the FDA’s CDRH
 
This Very neat package NEVER publicized Kept Mesh on the Market for use in the Female Pelvis and Reproductive System. This, in my opinion, is a crime against women. It PRESERVES:
a.       Use of mesh for abdominal sacral colpopexy by doctors
b.      The mesh profits for Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon Gynemesh
c.        Injury to hundreds of thousands of women patients
 
There is NO LEVEL ONE (1) EVIDENCE of success
of abdominal sacral colpopexy despite decades of use.
 
COLLUSION OR COINCIDENCE?

 
 

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

THE DECISION MAKERS and THE PAYEES - - - U.S. DISTRICT COURT for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA PTO 84 dated 08-26-2013 and PTO 207 dated 01-15-2016 COMMON BENEFITS FUND FEE & COST COMMITTEE (FCC) CONTACT INFO IS FROM THE PTO'S ON THE COURTS WEBSITE

THESE 18 ATTORNEYS IN PTO 84 BELOW ARE BEING PAID FROM THE 5% COMMON BENEFIT FUND OF ALL 7 MDLS IN WEST VIRGINIA.

THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF THE COMMON BENEFIT FUND BASED ON APPROXIMATELY 92,922 CASES THAT POTENTIALLY  SETTLE FOR $40,000.00 EACH WILL BE $1.8 BILLION DOLLARS FOR THE WORK THE 18 HAVE DONE.

READ ALL THE WAY TO THE BOTTOM TO SEE THE 9 PEOPLE WHO DECIDE WHO GETS WHAT PORTION OF THAT MINIMUM $1.8 BILLION DOLLARS.

IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING, THE ATTORNEYS WHO DO THE WORK IN THE MDL'S ARE THE ONES BEING PAID FROM THE 5% COMMON BENEFIT FUND $1.8 BILLION DOLLAR MINIMUM.

THE OTHER 40% BEING WITHHELD FROM YOUR SETTLEMENT IS MOST LIKELY FOR YOUR ORIGINAL ATTORNEY FILING YOUR SHORT FORM COMPLAINT, AND NOT MUCH ELSE. AND PROBABLY ADVERTISING COSTS TO GET YOU TO FIND HIM AND SIGN UP WITH HIM.


AUGUST 26, 2013 THE MDL 2187 C.R. BARD 5% FUND WAS ESTABLISHED BY PTO 84 WHICH YOU CAN FIND ON THE WEST VIRGINIA COURT WEBSITE.


PTO 84 AUGUST 26, 2013 ESTABLISHING MDL 2187 FUND to COMPENSATE and REIMBURSE ATTORNEYS for SERVICES PERFORMED and EXPENSES INCURRED  for MDL ADMINISTRATION and COMMON BENEFIT


Plaintiffs’ Coordinating Co-Leads, Executive Committee And Co-liaison Counsel, consulted

and approved the same among all Plaintiff Steering Committee Counsel

 
Harry F. Bell, Jr.

Plaintiffs’ Co-Liaison Counsel

hfbell@belllaw.com

West Virginia Bar No. 297

The Bell Law Firm, PLLC, P. O. Box 1723 Charleston, WV 25326

(304) 345-1700
 

Paul T. Farrell, Jr.

Plaintiffs’ Co-Liaison Counsel

paul@greeneketchum.com     

West Virginia Bar No. 7433

Greene Ketchum Bailey Walker Farrell & Tweel, P. O. Box 2389, Huntington, WV 25724-2389

(304) 525-9115

 
Carl N. Frankovitch

Plaintiffs’ Co-Liaison Counsel

carln@facslaw.com

West Virginia Bar No. 4746

Frankovitch Anetakis Colantonio & Simon, 337 Penco Road, Weirton, WV 26062

(304) 723-4400

 
Henry G. Garrard, III

Plaintiffs’ Coordinating Co-Lead Counsel and Executive Committee

hgg@bbgbalaw.com

Georgia Bar No. 286300

Blasingame Burch Garrard & Ashley, PC P. O. Box 832, Athens, GA 30603

(706) 354-4000

 
Fred Thompson, III

Plaintiffs’ Coordinating Co-Lead Counsel and Executive Committee

fthompson@motleyrice.com   South Carolina Bar No. 5548

Motley Rice, LLC, 28 Bridgeside Blvd., Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464

(843) 216-9118

 
Bryan F. Aylstock

Plaintiffs’ Coordinating Co-Lead Counsel and Executive Committee

BAylstock@awkolaw.com    

Florida Bar No. 078263

Alystock Witkin Kreis & Overholtz, 17 E. Main Street, Suite 200, Pensacola, FL 32502

(877) 810-4808

 
Clayton A. Clark

Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee

cclark@triallawfirm.com

Texas Bar No. 04275750

Clark, Love & Hutson, G.P., 440 Louisiana Street, Suite 1600, Houston, TX 77002

(713) 757-1400

 
Amy Eskin

Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee


California Bar No. 127668

Levin Simes LLP, 353 Sacramento Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111

(415) 426-3000
 

Derek H. Potts

Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee

dpotts@potts-law.com

Missouri Bar No. 44882

The Potts Law Firm, LLP 908 Broadway, 3rd Floor Kansas City, MO 64105

(816) 931-2230

 
Aimee H. Wagstaff

Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee


Colorado Bar No. 36819

Andrus Hood & Wagstaff, PC 1999 Broadway, Suite 4150, Denver, CO 80202

(303) 376-6360
 

Thomas P. Cartmell

Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee

tcartmell@wagstaffcartmell.com       

Missouri Bar No. 45366

Wagstaff & Cartmell, LLP 4740 Grand Avenue, Suite 300 Kansas City, MO 64112

(816) 701-1100
 

Fidelma P. Fitzpatrick

Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel


Rhodes Island Bar No. 5417

Motley Rice, LLC, 321 South Main Street, Suite 200, Providence, RI 02903

(401) 457-7700

 
Renee Baggett

Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel

RBaggett@awkolaw.com      

Florida Bar No. 0038186

Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz 17 East Main Street, Suite 200, Pensacola, FL 32502

(850) 202-1010


Mark C. Mueller

Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel


Texas Bar No. 14623000

Mueller Law, 404 West 7th Street Austin, TX 78701

(512) 478-1236

 
Robert Salim

Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel

robertsalim@cp-tel.net           

Louisiana Bar No. 11663

Law Offices of Robert L. Salim 1901 Texas Street, Natchitoches, LA 71457

(318) 352-5999

 
Riley Burnett

Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel


Texas Bar No. 03428900

Law Offices of Riley L. Burnett, Jr. 440 Louisiana, Suite 1600, Houston, TX 77002

(713) 757-1400
 

Benjamin H. Anderson

Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel


Ohio Bar No. 0067466

Anderson Law Offices, LLC 1360 West 9th Street, Suite 215, Cleveland, OH 44113

(216) 589-0256
 

Martin D. Crump

Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel


Mississippi Bar No. 10652

Davis & Crump, 1712 15th Street, Suite 300, Gulfport, MS 39501

(228) 863-6000



THE 9 PEOPLE BELOW ARE THE DECISION MAKERS AS TO WHO GETS PAID WHAT FROM THE 5% COMMON BENEFIT FUND BASED ON PT0 207, ALSO ON THE WEST VIRGINIA COURT WEBSITE. INTERESTING, HUH?


 


 
                                          IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

 

CHARLESTON DIVISION

 

IN RE: C.R. BARD, INC., PELVIC REPAIR

SYSTEM PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION                                                MDL 2187

-------------------------------------------------

 

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL CASES

 
PTO 207 Common Benefit Fee and Cost Committee (“FCC”)  01-15-2016

 

Henry G. Garrard, III

Blasingame, Burch, Garrard & Ashley, PC, 440 College Ave., Ste. 320, Athens, GA 30601

706-354-4000 706-549-3545 (fax)

hgg@bbgbalaw.com

 

Joseph F. Rice

Motley Rice, LLC, 28 Bridgeside Blvd., Mount Pleasant, SC 29464

843-216-9000 843-216-9450 (fax)

jrice@motleyrice.com

 

Clayton A. Clark

Clark, Love & Hutson, GP 440 Louisiana St., Ste. 1600, Houston, TX 77002

713-757-1400 713-759-1217 (fax)

cclark@triallawfirm.com

 

Carl N. Frankovitch

Frankovitch, Anetakis, Colantonio & Simon, 337 Penco Road, Weirton, WV 26062

304-723-4400 304-723-5892 (fax)

carln@facslaw.com

 

Yvonne Flaherty

Lockridge Grindal Nauen, Suite 2200, 100 Washington Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55401

612-339-6900 612-339-0981 (fax)

ymflaherty@locklaw.com

 

Thomas P. Cartmell

Wagstaff & Cartmell, LLP, 4740 Grand Avenue, Suite 300, Kansas City, MO 64112

816-701-1100 816-531-2372 (fax)

tcartmell@wagstaffcartmell.com

 Renee Baggett

Aylstock Witkin Kreis & Overholtz, Suite 200, 17 East Main Street, Pensacola, FL 32502

850-202-1010 805-916-7449 (fax)

RBaggett@awkolaw.com

 

Riley L. Burnett, Jr.

Burnett Law Firm, 55 Waugh Drive, Suite 803, Houston, TX 77007

832-413-4410 832-900-2120 (fax)

rburnett@rburnettlaw.com

 

William H. McKee, Jr.

1804 Louden Heights Road, Charleston, WV 25314

304-546-2347 

bmckee@suddenlink.net