Wednesday, September 12, 2018

OPEN LETTER TO HENRY GILBERT GARRARD III, CEO & CFO OF BLASINGAME, BURCH, GARRARD & ASHLEY PC, WHO IS THE EPITOME OF “UNEQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW”

HENRY GILBERT GARRARD III
BLASINGAME BURCH, GARRARD & ASHLEY PC
440 COLLEGE AVENUE
ATHENS, GA
706-354-4000

Dear Henry,

A reminder:
“Willful blindness (also referred to as deliberate ignorance, willful ignorance, and conscious avoidance) is a criminal state of mind that translates to putting your head in the sand.”









You are not a “Plaintiff’s Attorney”. You are, and have been a “Defense Attorney” since

the 1970’s when you represented Pittsburgh Corning’s lethal asbestos products in Multidistrict

Litigation. At that time, you filed motions Pittsburgh Corning had the right to have a trial against

every single plaintiff. Almost 500 plaintiffs died while waiting for trial due to your inhumane

motion practice.

Now based on the false evidence proffered through your leadership in Johnson &

Johnson/ Ethicon MDL 02327, not only is surgery to remove a Permanent Mesh Implant the

basis for settlement but 13,000 women do not have the right to a trial against Ethicon/Johnson&

Johnson.

Why is that?
1. In order for Plaintiffs’ Attorneys to recover under the IRS 468 B Qualified Settlement Funds, allowing Plaintiffs’ attorneys to be paid their 40% + 5% attorney fees immediately and the defendant to take the tax losses immediately.
2. To further your personal philosophy, “Don’t Kill the Company”.
3. To reduce the massive settlement amounts Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson would have to pay to an additional 13,000 plaintiffs by a conservative value of $1,456,000,000. [$1.456 billion dollars], preserving cash flow for Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson to pay you and your firm in other MDL’s.
4. So your firm, Blasingame, Burch, Garrard & Ashley P.C., would be able to recover millions of dollars when it sued the same Defendant, Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson, in other MDL’s, Ethicon Physiomesh and Johnson & Johnson Talc, which offered a greater opportunity of financial benefit to you and your firm personally.
a. You are once more on various Plaintiff’s Steering Committees suing Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson.
b. Johnson & Johnson talc cases have less plaintiffs and the jury verdicts have been substantially greater than those paid in transvaginal mesh cases.

You facilitated the violation of the right to due process as a co-lead counsel “Plaintiff’s

Attorney” to 13,000 mesh injured women plaintiffs. Judge Joseph Goodwin issued Pretrial Order

293 April 11, 2018 dismissing without prejudice 13,000 mesh injured women. No trials. No

motions. Just one objection from the Smith Kline law firm. None of the 13,000 Mesh Injured

Women even have a case in the court system anymore. Or an attorney.

Henry, are you really a “Plaintiff’s Attorney”? You hide behind that thick Southern drawl

and that beard and your always secret closed meetings. But you are not invisible. And you are

not invincible.

Based on personal knowledge, I know you are a common thief and a liar. You are a

predator and a parasite. You are a blight on the legal system and the thousands of asbestos

injured mesothelioma and mesh injured plaintiffs over decades. No remorse. No conscience.

You pretend to be a “Plaintiff’s Attorney” just as your co-counsel below pretend to be

“Plaintiff’s Attorneys”, when your actions and their actions scream “Defense Attorney”:

- Gary B. Blasingame and Josh Wages at your firm, Blasingame, Burch, Garrard & Ashley P.C.
- Bryan Aylstock and Douglas Kreis and Neil Overholtz at Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz (AWKO)
- Fred Thompson and Joseph Rice and Jonathan Orent at Motley Rice

Why do I say that?

Simple. A permanently implanted defective piece of surgical mesh has to be surgically

removed in order for you, the “Plaintiffs Attorney”, to prosecute lawsuits for your clients… for

synthetic surgical mesh kits for Stress Urinary Incontinence or Pelvic Organ Prolapse repair you

and all of your co-counsel have personal knowledge are defective , whether implanted in a

human or sitting on a shelf.

There are consequences to a criminal state of mind under the legal theory:

“Willful Blindness: A Substitute for Knowledge?
Willful blindness (also referred to as deliberate ignorance, willful ignorance, and conscious avoidance) is a criminal state of mind that translates to putting your head in the sand. Lawyers call it the “ostrich instruction,” and despite its arguable justification, it is a well-established aspect of federal criminal law. As determined by the U.S. Supreme Court, criminally-culpable “willful blindness” exists where:
The defendant subjectively believed that there was a high probability that an illegal activity took place, and
The defendant took deliberate action to avoid learning about the illegal activity.
When these two requirements are satisfied, willful blindness can – in some jurisdictions – substitute for actual knowledge.”

So how do I arrive at this conclusion?

Very simple. I read the docket history on pacer.gov for the various Transvaginal Mesh

MDL’s in the Southern District of West Virginia, in particular, Ethicon MDL 02327.  The

Plaintiff’s Steering Committee had a “back room” meeting and made an agreement with Defense

Attorney, Christy D. Jones, to file a Proposed Inactive Docket Order to place 13,000 “Non-

Revision” plaintiffs on the inactive docket.

Case 2:12-md-02327 Document 5045 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 158700

“Proposed Inactive Docket Order”
“The Court has been advised by counsel that in the cases listed on the attached Exhibit A, the plaintiff(s) and Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and where named, Ethicon LLC (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Ethicon”)1 because of prior agreements have agreed to a mutual stay of activity. The Court therefore finds it unnecessary to conduct further proceedings or to keep these cases on the active docket.”

Then Judge Goodwin summarily dismissed them without prejudice BECAUSE the

Plaintiff’s Steering Committee agreed to it with Christy Jones. Again. No motions. No

objections. No trials. No advance notice to the Plaintiffs themselves. Except for the brave

members of the Law Firm, Kline Specter, Philadelphia, PA who had the audacity to actually

fight for the 13,000.

Other than that just Pretrial Order No. 293, April 11, 2018 in Ethicon MDL 02327 signed

by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin at: Case 2:12-md-02327 Document 5592 Filed 04/11/18 Page 1 of

408 PageID #: 170182


So Henry, whether you are eventually criminally prosecuted or removed by your peers

because they realize their own willful blindness to your major conflicts of interest from your

leadership positions in the various Ethicon/ Johnson & Johnson Multidistrict Litigations, the

death and destruction you have caused to hundreds of thousands of asbestos injured

mesothelioma cancer plaintiffs or hundreds of thousands of transvaginal and hernia mesh

plaintiffs as a “Defense Attorney” , you will never be remembered as a “Plaintiffs Attorney”


LANA C. KEETON
“FIGHTING UNEQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW”



Facebook:  LANA KEETON  and  L.C. KEETON
Twitter:    @LanaKeeton  and  @PlaintiffPower1

www.MedDeviceExpertLLC.com  ~  LanaKeeton@MedDeviceExpertLLC.com
www.PlaintiffPoweredLaw.com  ~  www.TruthinMedicine.us.com  ~  www.LanaKeeton.com

Volume 1 Issue 10, September 11, 2018
© 2005-2018 all rights reserved Lana C. Keeton
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
901 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3-423, Miami Beach, FL 33139
305.671.9331 phone  .  800.509.9917 fax  .  305.342.8002 cell phone

Friday, September 7, 2018

LANA C. KEETON PRESENTATION "THE INTERSECTION OF MEDICINE & LAW" 09/05/2018 TO FDA'S CDRH 87,000 UN-REPORTED TRANSVAGINAL MESH ADVERSE REPORTS MADE BY MS. KEETON


LANA C. KEETON
© 2005 - 2018 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved. 09/05/2018
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Truth in Medicine & Med Device Expert LLC
Device Expert . Legal Consultant . Patient Advocate
901 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3-423, Miami Beach, FL 33139

305-671-9331 phone . 800-509-9917 fax

“THE INTERSECTION OF MEDICINE AND LAW” Hundreds of thousands of lawsuits wind up in Multidistrict Litigation where Adverse Event Reports go to Die.

THE UNITED STATES FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR DEVICES & RADIOLOGIC HEALTH ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS as of SEPTEMBER 5, 2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, S.D. WEST VIRGINIA

JOHNSON & JOHNSON/ETHICON INC 40,290 PLAINTIFFS

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC 25,282 PLAINTIFFS

AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS 21,251 PLAINTIFFS

BARD 15,694 PLAINTIFFS

COOK MEDICAL BIOLOGIC 640 PLAINTIFFS

Judge Joseph R. Goodwin issues Pretrial Order 273 in MDL02327, S.D.W.VA. Re: Johnson & Johnson/Ethicon Inc. 13,000 Transvaginal Mesh Injured Plaintiffs are dismissed without prejudice April 11, 2018 because of No Mesh Removal Surgery to remove a Permanent Implant

Today I submit a 3rd party report of over 87,000 unreported adverse events of severe injuries requiring surgical removal of the Synthetic Surgical Mesh manufactured by these 5 companies, for both Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

THE ANSWER to these THOUSANDS OF ADVERSE EVENTS: The FDA must REMOVE TRANSVAGINAL SYNTHETIC SURGICAL MESH FROM THE MARKET IMMEDIATELY.

Thursday, August 2, 2018

THE QUALIFIED SETTLEMENT FUND IRS 468 B: HOW ATTORNEYS SETTLE THOUSANDS OF CASES FOR HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS WHILE CHEATING THEIR CLIENTS OUT OF THEIR LEGAL RIGHTS


“THE DAILY DROP”
The Legal Cartel: Facts, Rumors & Innuendoes

Lana C. Keeton
Med Device Expert LLC
Legal Consultant  .  Medical Device Expert
© 2005 - 2018 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed

Volume 1 Issue 8 July 31, 2018

THE QUALIFIED SETTLEMENT FUND IRS 468 B:
HOW ATTORNEYS SETTLE THOUSANDS OF CASES FOR HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS WHILE CHEATING THEIR CLIENTS
OUT OF THEIR LEGAL RIGHTS

The “hernia mesh trial strategies” of the Ethicon Physiomesh and Atrium C-Qur

Plaintiff’s Steering Committees are doomed. The losing Transvaginal Mesh trial strategy, if you

can call it a trial strategy, is a dog that don’t hunt. It never did. Just ask those 13, 000 “Non-

revision” Plaintiffs dismissed without prejudice by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin by Pretrial Order

No. 293 in Ethicon MDL 02327 on April 11, 2018.

The only thing ever done in their favor was that hopefully some attorney or attorney firm

paid the filing fee for their case to be filed somewhere and it wound up in the U.S. District Court

for the Southern District of West Virginia. From then on the “Legal Cartel” took over and made

the decision for them: without surgery to remove the permanently implanted synthetic surgical

mesh, there would be no court proceedings for them. Preposterous.

The playbook currently being touted at Hernia Mesh Conferences is not a strategy to

win, it is a “strategy to settle” via an IRS 468 B Qualified Settlement Fund. The Defendants

have agreed to go through the “Motion Practice” gymnastics of another Multidistrict Litigation

as long as the Plaintiff’s Attorneys Steering Committees will maintain their philosophy “Don’t

Kill the Company”.  

Of course, all the attorneys and their plaintiff clients out in the hinterlands do not know

the truth. Many of these attorneys still believe they are advocating for their clients and won’t

know for a few years, they have zero control over their own client’s cases once in these

Multidistrict Litigations.

What a waste of time and energy and tax dollars spent servicing the multibillion dollar

legal industry for the benefit of major pharmaceutical and medical device companies. And for

the benefit of the attorneys, both defense and plaintiff. There you guys are hiding in plain sight

because all the “negotiations” in Multidistrict Litigation are confidential protecting your income

and that of the major corporations.

So as attorneys gather their thousands of cases with massive amounts of money being

spent on advertising, the Non-Plaintiff Steering Committee Attorneys are informed “Don’t take

hernia mesh cases where there has been no hernia mesh removal surgery. No surgery, no

lawsuit.” Really?

Why is that? The case has to fit into the expertise of the Plaintiffs Attorneys Steering

Committee, Settling through an IRS 468B Qualified Settlement Fund, which they will use to

settle virtually all the cases in the end of the MDL. An IRS 468 B Qualified Settlement Fund

requires the following:

“Section 468B Settlement Funds: What They Are and When and How to Use Them”

                   a.                        “Creating the 468B Fund.
                                                                                i.            Plaintiffs, settling defendants, or some combination of these parties
move the court for a discretionary order to approve establishing a 468B Fund, and to provide for a complete release of liability for each settling defendant (and its liability insurer) upon payment of an agreed amount into the Fund’s account.10
                                                                              ii.            Simultaneously, any litigating party moves the court to enter an order appointing an administrator for the 468B Fund and to establish terms of the Fund’s administration.11
                                                                            iii.            The Fund administrator files a notice of acceptance of this appointment, submitting the Fund’s administration to the jurisdiction of the establishing authority.
                  b.                        Administering the 468B Fund. Pursuant to the terms of the Fund’s           administration, the Fund’s administrator does its business as follows:
                                                                                i.            The administrator moves the court (or governmental authority) to enter its order approving settlement by and among plaintiffs, the Fund and any settling defendants, dismissing them with prejudice.
                                                                              ii.            Pursuant to court authorization, the administrator makes an initial distribution of attorney fees and costs to plaintiffs’ counsel,12 and of negotiated lien amounts to lienholders.
                                                                            iii.            The administrator files a declaration of supporting materials, which typically includes the following:
·         The Settlement Agreement, Assignment and Release of Claims by and among plaintiffs, the Fund and settling defendants;
·         Confirmation that all liens identified by claimants and their counsel have been addressed; and
·         The Settlement Agreements and Releases between the Fund and each claimant.
                                                                            iv.            With court approval, the administrator then signs Settlement Agreements and Releases with all claimants.
                                                                              v.            The administrator moves for an order approving the distributions to all claimants and to any remaining lienholders, certifying the individualized Settlement Agreements and Releases, and authorizing disbursement of remaining settlement proceeds pursuant to those agreements.”
LINK:

A permanently implanted defective piece of surgical mesh has to be surgically removed

in order for you, the attorney, to sue the maker of the defective piece of synthetic surgical mesh?

Talk about a doomed strategy. Like I said, that dog don’t hunt in hernia mesh cases.

Attorneys will not be able to say it was surgically implanted the wrong way, find

surgeons who are capable of, and willing to, do the surgical removals and the Plaintiffs

Attorneys Steering committee members (many of them) are clueless as to what Polypropylene

actually is. They focus only on the FDA recall reasons and not on the actual inherent defects in

every single piece of synthetic surgical mesh. They do not, and do not want to, understand what

polypropylene synthetic surgical mesh actually is and why it should not be used in humans.

Think I am kidding? Next hernia mesh conference, ask some of the “knowledgeable”

speakers “What is polypropylene?” No cognizant answer will follow. But ask them about all the

IRS 468B  Qualified Settlement Funds they themselves have from the thousands of clients they

have cheated, now there is their expertise. Their own personal millions of dollars in their own

law firm or their own personal accounts. Not how to win at trial. Not how to fight for your

clients rights to a trial. Not how to follow the law. Just how to settle.

So how does one arrive at this conclusion? Pretty easy if one reads the docket for the

various Transvaginal Mesh MDL’s in West Virginia, in particular, Ethicon MDL 02327 in the

Southern District of West Virginia.  The Plaintiff’s Steering Committee had a “back room”

meeting and made an agreement with Defense Attorney, Christy D. Jones, to file a Proposed

Inactive Docket Order to place 13,000 “Non-Revision” plaintiffs on the inactive docket.

Case 2:12-md-02327 Document 5045 Filed 11/13/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 158700

“PROPOSED INACTIVE DOCKET ORDER”
“The Court has been advised by counsel that in the cases listed on the attached Exhibit A, the plaintiff(s) and Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and where named, Ethicon LLC (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Ethicon”)1 because of prior agreements have agreed to a mutual stay of activity. The Court therefore finds it unnecessary to conduct further proceedings or to keep these cases on the active docket.”

Then Judge Goodwin summarily dismissed them without prejudice BECAUSE the

Plaintiff’s Steering Committee agreed to it with Christy Jones. No motions. No objections.

No trials. No advance notice to the Plaintiffs themselves. Except for the brave members of the

Law Firm, Kline Specter, Philadelphia, PA who had the audacity to actually fight for the 13,000. 

Other than that just Pretrial Order No. 293, April 11, 2018 in Ethicon MDL 02327 signed by

Judge Joseph R. Goodwin at:

Case 2:12-md-02327 Document 5592 Filed 04/11/18 Page 1 of 408 PageID #: 170182

Most likely these 13,000 "Non-Revision Plaintiffs" who were dismissed without

prejudice can thank Henry Garrard III and Gary B. Blasingame of Blasingame, Burch, Garrard &

Ashley and Fred Thompson and Joseph Rice of Motley Rice and Bryan Aylstock and Douglas

Kreis of Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz.  They are the perpetual lead counsel / plaintiffs

steering committee of various monstrous Multidistrict Litigations (mesh, asbestos, tobacco, 9/11,

etc.). They, and/or others in their firms, are also the plaintiff’s steering committee in multidistrict

litigations for Ethicon Physiomesh and Atrium C-Qur.

Not a pretty picture for the thousands and thousands of Americans who wind up in these

massive litigations, who are summarily treated as non-humans, just numbers. I truly wish I had

no awareness of the incredible amount of corruption in our court system. But I do.

So this publication series will continue to expose the ugly underbelly of the over 100,000

Transvaginal #MESH lawsuits passing through the MDL’s in the Southern District of West

Virginia.

Disclaimer: This is addressed to the Guilty “SETTLEMENT PROFESSIONALS”,
and they know who they are. It is not addressed to the Honest Members of the Bar, to the
“NON-SETTLEMENT PROFESSIONALS”, Real Attorneys, Thank you for being honest.


“FIGHTING TO STOP UNEQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW”



Facebook:  LANA KEETON  and  L.C. KEETON

Twitter:    @LanaKeeton  and  @PlaintiffPower1


Volume 1 Issue 8 July 31, 2018
© 2005-2018 all rights reserved Lana C. Keeton
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
901 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3-423, Miami Beach, FL 33139
305.671.9331 phone  .  800.509.9917 fax  .  305.342.8002 cell phone

Sunday, June 24, 2018

A PEAK INTO THE LIVES OF THE 13,000 ABANDONED WOMEN "NON-REVISION" #MESH PLAINTIFFS FORCED TO BE BUTCHERED (PTO#293 SIGNED BY JUDGE GOODWIN IN U.S.DIST.CT. WVA) OR LOSE LEGAL REPRESENTATION “THE DAILY DROP” The Legal Cartel: Facts, Rumors & Innuendoes by Lana C. Keeton, Med Device Expert LLC . Legal Consultant . Medical Device Expert © 2005 - 2018 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed Volume 1, Issue 5 June 22, 2018



“THE DAILY DROP”

The Legal Cartel: Facts, Rumors & Innuendoes
by 
Lana C. Keeton
 Med Device Expert LLC
Legal Consultant  .  Medical Device Expert
© All rights reserved. Lana C. Keeton 2005 - 2018
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
 Volume 1, Issue 5 June 22, 2018

A PEAK INTO THE LIVES OF THE 13,000 ABANDONED
NON-REVISION #MESH PLAINTIFFS
FORCED TO BE BUTCHERED OR LOSE LEGAL REPRESENTATION



Meet DOTTIE GRIGGS 

“NON-REVISION” PLAINTIFF DYING FROM MESH..
A former ER Nurse at Baylor Hospital, a former Urgent Care Nurse at GMC, an HMO, a former Coronary Care at Rowan Hospital, Former General Manager at Hilton Hotel Corporation

Here’s the word on Facebook… From DOTTIE GRIGGS, just one woman among thousands, who are furious with Pretrial Order 293 and denial of her rights to a trial by her own attorneys. Even the famous amazing surgeon DR. SHLOMO RAZ, who consulted with her will not operate on DOTTIE GRIGGS. Maybe the Plaintiffs Attorneys Steering Committee does not know how to prosecute a “Non-Revision” Plaintiff  case but this “Non-Revision” Plaintiff  does.

            
FACEBOOK POST on 06/08/2018 by DOTTIE GRIGGS,
a Really Smart Mesh Injured Woman
(reprinted with her permission)


“I want to know when the judge in WV also obtained his medical degree in urology and gynecology. He is not an expert at medical, his specialty is supposed to be the law.

However, as we can all see the scales of justice do not set balanced. There are a number of reasons people who need surgery for mesh removal can't have it.
  
 Number #1 reason look at the number of patients that need it and the number of qualified 
 physicians that have the skills to perform it.

#2. Look at the # of Doc's who denied there being any such problem for so many years.
  
#3 Distance, how do the patients all afford to get to these doctors that have the skills, we
don’t all have money trees growing in our backyard. Or an attorneys, doctors, or judges
income.

#4 Why in the world is the sick patient having to bare all the responsibility to begin with.
The Manufactures knew this was going to cause people problems they just did not know
how soon . Admitted in their 2007 annual meeting of AUGS, in addition to it was still in
experimental stages and should not have been billed. No data had been submitted during
those years tracking the patients. To bill was a FELONY, to send the bill through the mail
was a FEDERAL OFFENSE, also a felony.

# 5. When F.D.A. recalled the first implant kit approved, did they not have sense enough
to STOP the other like ones from going to market, rather than grandfathered them in
510K. I have been to multiple doctors seeking help during 12 years, i have been blown
off, lied to, humiliated, given narcotic prescriptions, given help no. Not even by one of
the Most Renowned Doc's in this field. Now I am told I am in too bad of conditions, that
maybe another specialist could do something.

How many years how many doctors does one go to? You’re sick or you wouldn’t be
going to start with, this is not a world travel adventure.

Women/men have had from no surgeries after implant suffering to 20 and I believe I
heard 45 surgeries. My body is damaged. I have multiple complications. 

I am going to die from it. 
Or get lucky and get hit by a bus. 
But for a Judge, any Judge, 
to determine 
the worth of our Vagina 
and the rest of our health 
on the # of surgeries is wrong.


What is right? It’s for the manufactures and the FDA to accept responsibility. Set up a
hospital for treatment, get some doctors trained in removal and help us. The cost is on the
manufacturers, FDA, original doctor and hospital doing the implanting. The patient still
receives equal settlement the same for all, we’re not Call Girls one getting $100 a night
and another $5k.

You can't award one woman $15K for injuries and another $54 million, plus her husband.
What those of us not married didn’t lose consortium? Well I hope all remember the song
“I Can't Get No Satisfaction ". That’s what’s been done mutilation and pain.

The only people gaining anything at the cost of our health,The Courts they get a % of every claim. The attorneys both sides. And why in God’s name would we be paying an insurance company that performed surgery on many of us without our knowledge, if they had stolen our kidney, would we pay insurance for that. All the following care needed because of something that should not have been on the market and harmed us, get real.

That’s like hiring a hit man and paying him two times before and after.”

HOW DID THIS HAPPEN??

Over 13,000 "Non-Revision Plaintiffs" who were dismissed without prejudice can probably thank Henry Garrard III of Blasingame, Burch,Garrard & Ashley and Fred Thompson & Joseph Rice of Motley Rice and Bryan Aylstock of Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz.

These men have been for decades the perpetual lead counsel / plaintiffs steering committee of various monstrous Multidistrict Litigations (mesh, asbestos, tobacco, 9/11, etc.). They, and/or others in their firms, are also the plaintiff’s steering committee in multidistrict litigations for Ethicon Physiomesh and Atrium C-Qur. They should all immediately resign from their positions on the plaintiffs steering committee of Ethicon Physiomesh and Atrium C-qur for conflict of interest in not fully prosecuting these 13,000 women’s cases.

So how do we remedy another potential 13,000 “Non-Revision” Plaintiffs in the Multidistrict Litigations for Ethicon Physiomesh and/or Atrium C-Qur if these men do not resign? Add new qualifications, not a part of the current member of the “Good Ole Boys/Girls Club” qualification, to the current ones.

The current method of determining who will serve on the Plaintiffs Steering Committees for MDL and Class Action lawsuits has to change. The rules for nominating Plaintiffs Steering Committees have to include the following additional investigation of these powerful few men and women attorneys who control the destiny of  hundreds of thousands of Plaintiffs across the United States in the United States Court System:
                       
1)      Forensic accounting of finances of Lead and Co-Lead counsel to determine they have actually paid their previous clients all the money they are owed and are actually financially stable.

2)      A psychological evaluation to eliminate the potential narcissist and/or sociopath.

3)      Drug testing to prevent drug addicted attorneys holding these positions of power

4)      Are there conflicts of interest with their current case load, as in the current situation between 13,000 “Non-Revision Plaintiffs and the new Hernia Mesh Plaintiffs for Ethicon Physiomesh and Atrium C-Qur?

The confidentiality demanded by Defendants, and agreed to by Plaintiff’s Attorneys Steering Committee, in order to settle claims for hundreds of millions of dollars must see the light of day to stop the Three C’s: the very likely collusion, corruption and conspiracy.


The philosophy of the powerful few: 
“Don’t Kill the Company”
To perpetuate the power and positions of 
the Repeat Entrenched Players 
and their Repeat Entrenched Law Firms 
in massive multidistrict litigations for decades

IS KILLING DOTTIE GRIGGS!


This publication series will continue to expose the ugly underbelly of the West Virginia Multidistrict Litigations which has over 100,000 cases in the Southern District of West Virginia. Please continue to enjoy the ride. There’s a lot of ugly underbelly!




© 2005 - 2018 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
901 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3-423, Miami Beach, FL 33139
305.671.9331 phone  .  800.509.9917 fax  .  305.342.8002 cell phone