Wednesday, January 22, 2020

LEGAL RAPE IN #MESH MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION? SEEMS SO IN PRETRIAL ORDER 293, SIGNED AND AUTHORIZED BY JUDGE JOSPEH R. GOODWIN, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

by Lana C. Keeton
Med Device Expert LLC
Legal Consultant  .  Medical Device Expert
© 2005 – 2020  Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
Intellectual Property of Lana C. Keeton
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
Volume III  Issue 1 January 22, 2020

LEGAL RAPE IN #MESH MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION?
ASK JUDGE GOODWIN.
 HE SIGNED THE ORDER. 

Judge Joseph R. Goodwin 

SEEMS SO IN PRETRIAL ORDER 293, SIGNED AND AUTHORIZED BY
JUDGE JOSPEH R. GOODWIN,
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST 
VIRGINIA APRIL 11, 2018 ETHICON MDL-2327

 AND ASK HENRY GILBERT GARRARD III, CLAYTON CLARK, SCOTT LOVE, SHELLEY HUTSON, BRYAN AYLSTOCK, TOM CARTMELL, JOE RICE, FRED THOMPSON, JONATHAN ORENT, MARK MUELLER...THEY KNOW WHAT THEY DID!

MY OPINION: PRETRIAL ORDER 293 = LEGAL RAPE

PLAINTIFFS ATTORNEY STEERING COMMITTEE
MAKES PELVIC SURGICAL MESH REMOVAL A REQUIREMENT TO BE PAID FROM THE PELVIC MESH SETTLEMENT FUNDS OF ETHICON/JOHNSON & JOHNSON,
MDL 02327 U.S. DISTRICT COURT, S.D. W.VA. under the authority of
JUDGE JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, PRETRIAL ORDER 293, APRIL 11, 2018

PELVIC SURGICAL MESH REMOVAL IS A STRAWMAN
It is a COLLABORATION of Plaintiff & Corporate Defense Attorneys
to qualify to MOVE MONEY to THEMSELVES through a
IRS 468B QUALIFIED SETTLEMENT FUND.

Synthetic Polypropylene Pelvic Surgical Mesh is a permanently implanted medical device.
It is NOT intended to be REMOVED.

PELVIC SURGICAL MESH REMOVAL IS A STRAWMAN!
30 REASONS WHY!
  1. No informed consent exists for any Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson pelvic surgical mesh to be implanted into any human.
  2. Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson pelvic surgical mesh implants are fraudulently on the market because Ethicon/J&J would only pay Dr. Ulf Ulmsten for clinical trials he performed pursuant to a written contract. Dr. Ulmsten signed the contract on February 13, 1997 agreeing all clinical trials would have good outcomes.
  3. There is no Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson protocol for removal of the pelvic surgical mesh in the instructions for use (IFU).
  4. There is no protocol for locating the Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson permanently implanted pelvic surgical mesh inside the body in the instructions for use (IFU).
  5. There is no known protocol recommended for pelvic surgical mesh removal by professional medical societies.
  6. Any and all pelvic surgical mesh removals are fishing expeditions and consequently, experimental surgical procedures.
  7. There are only a handful of qualified skilled surgeons in the U.S. who will attempt to do the surgical removal of pelvic mesh. Women travel from other countries for pelvic surgical mesh removal surgery in the U.S. because pelvic surgical mesh removal surgery is unavailable in their own countries.
  8. Insurance Companies deny coverage because the surgical mesh removal procedures are experimental.
  9. If the mesh injured patient does have insurance, will it pay for removal?
  10. Does the surgeon, if able to remove pelvic surgical mesh, accept that insurance?
  11. Mayo Clinic has a stated policy they will not treat pelvic mesh injuries if the woman patient is engaged in a lawsuit.
  12. The success and/or failure of pelvic surgical mesh removal depends on the skill of the surgeon and the overall health of each patient. Pelvic surgical mesh removal does not leave the patient uninjured because every time mesh is removed, it includes removing the patient’s own pelvic tissue which has grown into the interstices of the pelvic surgical mesh. Removing pelvic surgical mesh from the vagina is like cutting gum from hair.
  13. The constant inflammation from ongoing internal scarring is a permanent injury.
  14. Constant inflammation leads to autoimmune and other serious, potentially fatal diseases.
  15. Inflammation never ends as macrophages try to remove the polypropylene foreign body from the body.
  16. Macrophages develop into foreign body giant cells that try to digest and/or eject the pelvic surgical mesh from the body. It is impossible because of the size of the mesh itself.
  1. Small particles fall off the discontinuous loops of the edges of the pelvic surgical mesh. The particles are moved through the body in an effort to expel them from the body, exiting through the skin of all parts of the body.
  2. Most surgeons are not qualified to surgically remove surgical mesh.
  3. Most surgeons will not attempt surgical removal of mesh.
  4. As the native pelvic tissue weakens with the age of the patient, the surgical mesh does not weaken. Surgical mesh consequently moves through the body without any deterrent from the body’s own tissues.
  5. Deadly, life threatening infections from biofilms on the polypropylene surgical mesh that are antibiotic resistant, kill women over time.
  6. PTSD post traumatic stress disorder
  7. Inability to urinate
  8. Inability to defecate
  9. Inability to have sex
  10. Can not work
  11. Can not walk
  12. PAINFUL in office trimmings of delicate pelvic tissue to remove pieces & parts of pelvic surgical mesh without anesthesia are recommended by the Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson so pelvic surgical mesh removals will not be counted as a surgical procedure in the hospital.
  13. ANY pelvic surgical mesh removal removes healthy pelvic and/or vaginal tissue that has grown into the interstices of the mesh causing additional injury(ies) to the already existing injury(ies) from initial implantation.
  14.  The FINANCIAL COSTS of pelvic surgical mesh implantation is relatively low compared to the exorbitant costs of pelvic surgical mesh removal, frequently leaving the mesh injured patient in financial ruin.
DID ETHICON MDL 02327 WEST VIRGINIA PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEYS STEERING COMMITTEE MAKE ANY OBJECTION TO RITUAL MESH REMOVAL MUTILATION OF 13,000 WOMEN ORDERED BY JUDGE JOSEPH GOODWIN PTO 293 APRIL 11, 2018?


WILL CORRUPT PLAINTIFFS ATTORNEYS BE THE
DEATH OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION?
Why do I ask these questions?

Because of various civil lawsuits against Pelvic Mesh Plaintiff’s Attorneys, CLAYTON CLARK, SCOTT LOVE and SHELLEY HUTSON, CLARK, LOVE HUTSON alleging legal malpractice and criminal indictments for fraud against a Urogynecologist, DR. CHRISTOPHER WALKER, Orlando, Florida, and a Medical Funder, WESLEY BLAKE BARBER, Detroit, Michigan by the Department of Justice.

Very Serious Stuff.

MY PERSONAL OPINION –
THE MASSIVE PELVIC MESH MDL’S HAVE BECOME A DISASTER.
1.      Outright Theft from Plaintiffs by Forced Consent to Dismissal Without Prejudice pursuant to Pretrial Order 293, Ethicon MDL 02327.
2.      Violation of Plaintiff’s Rights to Due Process under the 5th and/or 14th Amendments
3.      Potential Mental Disorders of Plaintiff’s Attorneys in Power over all the Pelvic Mesh MDL’s Non-Steering Committee Plaintiffs Attorneys.
4.      Rampant Willful Blindness, a criminal state of mind as defined by the Supreme Court,  throughout the Multidistrict Litigations in the Federal Court System has drawn the attention of the U.S. House of Representatives, who passed HR 985 in February of 2017.    And the U.S. Senate where Senator Charles Grassley introduced legislation S. 2815 To Increase Transparency and Oversight of 3rd Party Litigation Funding, on May 10, 2018.
And the Department of Justice filing charges on May 24, 2019 against “Wesley Blake Barber, 49, of Detroit, Michigan, the owner of Surgical Assistance Inc. and Medical Funding Consultants LLC, and Christopher Walker, M.D., 49, of Orlando, Florida, and owner of MedSurg Holdings LLC, in an indictment filed in the Eastern District of New York with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, three counts of wire fraud, one count of conspiracy to violate the Travel Act and one count of violating the Travel Act.
5.      Gaslightingis used to manipulate Mesh Injured Plaintiff Clients, who are isolated, warned not to communicate anything to anyone about their lawsuit and easily abused by their own attorney because of their lack of knowledge of the law. Gaslighting is “a form of manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or members of a group, hoping to make targets question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, it attempts to destabilize the target and delegitimize the target’s belief.”
Usage: “Sociopaths and narcissists frequently use gaslighting tactics. Sociopaths consistently transgress social mores, break laws, and exploit others, but typically also are convincing liars, sometimes charming ones, who consistently deny wrongdoing.”
6.      Outright Theft of Plaintiffs Settlement Money by Attorneys Manipulation and Abuse of  Qualified Settlement Funds under IRS 468 B where there is no forensic accounting.
7.      Double dipping of cases. Are settlements paid by Defendants to Plaintiffs Attorneys, who don’t equitably distribute those IRS 468 B settlement funds to their own Plaintiff Clients, then placing the very same case on the docket again? QSF’s are ripe for Plaintiff Abuse.



MARK R. MUELLER, left, MUELLER LAW, 
AUSTIN, TX, and HENRY GILBERT GARRARD III,                                             right, BLASINGAME, BURCH, GARRARD & 
ASHLEY PC, ATHENS, GA



      










It is a tragic state of affairs when trust is placed in the laws of the United States and in our Court System and in attorneys who violate their fiduciary duty to prey on innocent injured Plaintiff Clients. Fortunately some Attorneys are now filing legal malpractice lawsuits against those Attorneys exposing those who abused their very own Plaintiff Clients, in State and Federal Court. 
Regards,
Lana C. Keeton
© 2005 – 2020 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
Intellectual Property of Lana C. Keeton.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Med Device Expert LLC
Legal Consultant . Expert Witness . Device Expert . Patient Advocate
901 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3-423, Miami Beach, FL 33139

THIS COURT HOUSE BELONGS TO THE INJURED PLAINTIFFS SEEKING JUSTICE!



Thursday, October 17, 2019

JANE AKRE, THE FRAUD at MESH MEDICAL DEVICE NEWS DESK, IS A DISSERVICE TO HUMANITY AND ALL #MESH INJURED MEN & WOMEN


ATTN: JANE AKRE
Mesh Medical Device News Desk

YOU ARE A FRAUD. You brought us Estelle Tasz, pictured with you below, who had no mesh and scammed other mesh injured, you took her to a trial in West Virginia supposedly 3 weeks after mesh removal surgery looking great which certainly impacted the verdict of the jury.) 


You are nasty, vile, trashy, disgusting, a very low class sleeze bag.


Definition of sleeze bag:
A low class person who does not shower, shave, or go to work. A person with low moral standards, often very promiscuous.


You are a thief and a liar.

You are a predator and a parasite.

You are a disservice to humanity.

This is my official position in regard to your impact on mesh injured people worldwide. You have knowingly harmed hundreds of thousands of men and women worldwide.

This will be published in hopes of stopping the continuing harm you cause so many.

Lana C. Keeton
© 2005 – 2019 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Med Device Expert LLC
Device Expert . Legal Consultant . Patient Advocate
901 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3-423, Miami Beach, FL 33139

305-671-9331 phone . 800-509-9917 fax
786-566-7780 . 305-342-8002 cell phones


AND THIS WAS IN THE LOCAL NEWSPAPER WHEN YOU PROTESTED AT J&J. A MAN WHO LOOKS LIKE HE IS RUNNING A LEMONADE STAND TO REPRESENT #MESH INJURED WOMEN. THIS MAKES ALL #MESH INJURED MEN & WOMEN LOOK BAD. #MESH IS NOT A LAUGHING MATTER BUT J&J GOT THE LAST LAUGH ON THIS ONE. 



Friday, August 23, 2019

AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM FAILS THOUSANDS OF PLAINTIFFS AS IT CRUMBLES UNDER THE WEIGHT OF CORRUPTION BY ATTORNEYS & JUDGES. FIGHT WITH ME AGAINST UNEQUAL JUSTICE IN MASSIVE #MESH MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN WEST VIRGINIA ~ ~ MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE JOSEPH R. GOODWIN FILED AUGUST 23, 2019

PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP SEES THE AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM
CRUMBLING FROM THE WEIGHT OF
THE CORRUPTION IN THE COURT SYSTEM
THE WHITE HOUSE. WASHINGTON, D.C.07/27/2010
@all rights reserved Lana C. Keeton
MOAR RALLY, WASHINGTON, D.C. 09/08/2018
@all rights reserved Lana C. Keeton

THE DAILY DROP”
The Legal Cartel: Facts, Rumors & Innuendos

“LANA C. KEETON’S MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF JUDGE JOSEPH R. GOODWIN & MEMORANDUM OF LAW” “DUE TO PERSONAL BIAS and PREJUDICE AGAINST LANA C. KEETON and POTENTIAL MISHANDLING OF COMMON BENEFIT FUNDS”

by…..   Lana C. Keeton
Med Device Expert LLC
Legal Consultant  .  Medical Device Expert
© 2005 – 2019 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
Volume II, Issue 6, August 23, 2019

901 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3-423, Miami Beach, FL 33139
305.671.9331 phone  .  800.509.9917 fax  .  305.342.8002 cell phone

LET'S FIGHT 
UNEQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW
IN MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION 
TOGETHER

ACTUAL COURT DOCUMENT...  Excerpt from LANA C. KEETON"s
Case 2:12-md-02327 Document 8580 Filed 08/23/19 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 207547

Page 1 of 16
“LANA C. KEETON’S
MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF JUDGE JOSEPH R. GOODWIN &
MEMORANDUM OF LAW”
“DUE TO PERSONAL BIAS and PREJUDICE AGAINST LANA C. KEETON
and POTENTIAL MISHANDLING OF COMMON BENEFIT FUNDS”

“Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455 (a) and certain sections of 28 U.S.C. § 455  (b), Plaintiff Pro Se Litigant, Legal Consultant and Medical Device Expert LANA C. KEETON calls for Judge Joseph R. Goodwin to recuse himself from any further adjudication of Keeton’s rightful legitimate claims to be paid from the Common Benefit Fund(s) of:”
“IN RE: C.R. BARD, INC.                                       MDL NO. 2187
IN RE: AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC  MDL NO. 2325
IN RE: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC                                MDL NO. 2326
IN RE: ETHICON, INC.                                           MDL NO. 2327
IN RE: COLOPLAST                                                MDL NO. 2387
IN RE: COOK MEDICAL, INC                                MDL NO. 2440
IN RE: NEOMEDIC                                                   MDL NO. 2511”

                Page 15 of 16
“Pursuant to these Supreme Court case laws and U.S. Judicial Codes, Judge Goodwin must recuse himself because:
1.      The risk of bias was too high to be constitutionally tolerable.
2.      Judge Goodwin’s significant personal involvement in an earlier judicial proceeding related to Lana C. Keeton
3.      Under 28 U.S.C. § 455 (a), recusal is mandatory in “any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”
4.      “Section 455(b) (1) provides that a judge should disqualify himself in any proceeding in which he has “a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding.” ie., Judge Goodwin’s close personal relationship with William H. McKee, Jr. whom he appointed to be paid from the Common Benefit Fund(s) based on his “non-attorney participation” on the Fee and Cost Committee and his personal knowledge of the facts of Keeton’s Case No. 2:13cv24276”

“Judge Joseph R. Goodwin’s clear bias and prejudice against Lana C. Keeton mandate his recusal. He favors Henry G. Garrard III and other known bad actors, Officers of the Court, who do not hesitate to place false evidence into the United States Federal District Court System         through their “theft by allocation” of unearned Common Benefits Fund over Lana C. Keeton’s rights to the fair and honest and due administration of justice and her rights to Due Process under the 5th/14th Amendments of the Constitution.”

Lana C. Keeton
© 2005 – 2019 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Med Device Expert LLC
Legal Consultant . Expert Witness . Device Expert . Patient Advocate
901 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3-423, Miami Beach, FL 33139

Facebook:  LANA KEETON  and  L.C. KEETON
Twitter:    @PlaintiffPower1

Volume II Issue 6 August 23, 2019
© 2005-2019 all rights reserved Lana C. Keeton

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
901 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3-423, Miami Beach, FL 33139

Monday, July 29, 2019

ABUSED BY YOUR #MESH ATTORNEY? TEXANS DON'T LIKE ANYONE WHO ABUSES A WOMAN... @JNJCares @Ethicon @BostonSci @BardDavol @bbgalaw @motleyrice @awkolaw


ABUSED BY YOUR #MESH ATTORNEY? 

TEXANS DON'T LIKE ANYONE WHO 
ABUSES A WOMAN...

DO SOMETHING ABOUT ATTORNEY ABUSE! 

SO LET ME TELL YOU A STORY...  
ABOUT COLLUSION, CORRUPTION & CONSPIRACY.... READ BELOW TO SEE THE FIGHT WE ARE IN!


“THE DAILY DROP” 
The Legal Cartel: Facts, Rumors & Innuendoes

by Lana C. Keeton  Med Device Expert LLC 
Legal Consultant  .  Medical Device Expert
© 2005 – 2019  Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed - 1st Published:   Volume 1, Issue 6 July 18, 2018
  
THE THREE C’s:
THE VERY LIKELY COLLUSION, CORRUPTION and CONSPIRACY
of the LEGAL CARTEL

The philosophy of the powerful few PLAINTIFFS' ATTORNEYS STEERING COMMITTEE in the West Virginia #MESH and other massive Multidistrict litigations is:                                                                                                                           “Don’t Kill the Company”

This philosophy has, and will continue to, perpetuate the power and positions of the Repeat Entrenched Players and their Repeat Entrenched Law Firms in massive multidistrict litigations across the U.S. for decades. 

These men and women perpetuate Unequal Justice Under the Law and the physical and financial ruin of their own plaintiffs. They perpetuate the use of extremely harmful drugs and devices. They have to be disbarred and brought to justice. And the guilty know who they are and what they have done. Hint. Hint. See below...


There’s not going to be any jury in a court of law on this matter. Just a public inquiry by the peers of these powerful unethical attorneys who should be disbarred, in particular for presenting false evidence in their prosecution of the over 104,000 Transvaginal Mesh lawsuits, under the authority of Judge Joseph R. Goodwin in the Southern District of West Virginia.


“But for a Judge, any Judge, to determine the worth of our Vagina and the rest of our health on the number of surgeries is wrong.”
Dottie Griggs, Non-Revision Plaintiff


Over 13,000 "Non-Revision Plaintiffs" who were dismissed without prejudice can probably thank

Henry Garrard III and Gary B. Blasingame of Blasingame, Burch, Garrard & Ashley 
- and - 
Clayton Clark and Scott Love and Shelley Hutson of Clark, Love Hutson 
- and – 
Fred Thompson and Joseph Rice of Motley Rice
- and -
Bryan Aylstock and Douglas Kreis of Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz.

These and others have been for years and years the perpetual lead counsel / plaintiffs steering committee of various monstrous Multidistrict Litigations (mesh, asbestos, tobacco, 9/11, etc.). They, and/or others in their firms, are also the plaintiff’s steering committee in multidistrict litigations for Ethicon Physiomesh and Atrium C-Qur. They should all immediately resign from their positions on the plaintiffs steering committee of Ethicon Physiomesh and Atrium C-qur for conflict of interest in not fully prosecuting these 13,000 women’s cases in Ethicon’s MDL 02327.

So how do we remedy another potential 13,000 “Non-Revision” Plaintiffs in the Multidistrict Litigations for Ethicon Physiomesh and/or Atrium C-Qur if these men/women do not resign? Add new qualifications, not a part of the current member of the “Good Ole Boys/Girls Club” qualifications, to the current ones.

The current method of determining who will serve on the Plaintiffs Steering Committees for MDL and Class Action lawsuits has to change. The rules for nominating Plaintiffs Steering Committees have to include the following additional investigation of these powerful few men and women attorneys who control the destiny of  hundreds of thousands of Plaintiffs across the United States in the United States Court System:

1)      Forensic accounting of finances of Lead and Co-Lead counsel to determine they have actually paid their previous clients all the money they are owed and are actually financially stable.

2)      A psychological evaluation to eliminate the potential narcissist and/or sociopath.

3)      Drug testing to prevent drug addicted attorneys holding these positions of power

4)      Are there conflicts of interest with their current case load, as in the current situation between 13,000 “Non-Revision Plaintiffs and the new Hernia Mesh Plaintiffs for Ethicon Physiomesh and Atrium C-Qur?

This publication series will continue to expose the ugly underbelly of the West Virginia Multidistrict Litigations which has over 100,000 cases in the Southern District of West Virginia. Please continue to read this series. You need to fully understand the ugly underbelly of Multidistrict Litigations in the U.S.

© 2005 – 2019 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
901 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3-423, Miami Beach, FL 33139
305.671.9331 phone  .  800.509.9917 fax  .  305.342.8002 cell phone

IN HONOR OF KENNETH HAROLD KEETON
MY FATHER, WHO LEFT THIS WORLD 56 YEARS AGO TODAY, JULY 18, 1962,
AN HONEST HARDWORKING MAN WHO TAUGHT ME TO DO THE SAME, BE HONEST & HARDWORKING.


Sunday, June 30, 2019

THE DEATH OF PELVIC MESH MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION: CORRUPT ATTORNEYS, ET.AL.?



by Lana C. Keeton
Med Device Expert LLC
Legal Consultant  .  Medical Device Expert
© 2005 - 2019 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed


DOMINOES, DOMINOES, DOMINOES…
THEY JUST KEEP FALLING

IS PELVIC MESH MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION 
IMPLODING AS PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEYS 
CORRUPTION IS EXPOSED?

Why do I ask this question? Because of various civil lawsuits against Pelvic Mesh Plaintiff’s Attorneys alleging legal malpractice and criminal indictments for fraud against a Urogynecologist and a Medical Funder by the Department of Justice. Serious stuff.

MY PERSONAL OPINION –
THE MASSIVE PELVIC MESH MDL’S HAVE BECOME A DISASTER.
1.      Outright Theft from Plaintiffs by Forced Consent to Dismissal Without Prejudice pursuant to Pretrial Order 293, Ethicon MDL 02327.
2.      Violation of Plaintiff’s Rights to Due Process under the 5th and/or 14th Amendments
3.      Potential Mental Disorders of Plaintiff’s Attorneys in Power over all the Pelvic Mesh MDL’s Non-Steering Committee Plaintiffs Attorneys.
4.      Rampant Willful Blindness, a criminal state of mind as defined by the Supreme Court,  throughout the Multidistrict Litigations in the Federal Court System has drawn the attention of the U.S. House of Representatives, who passed HR 985 in February of 2017.    And the U.S. Senate where Senator Charles Grassley introduced legislation S. 2815 To Increase Transparency and Oversight of 3rd Party Litigation Funding, on May 10, 2018.
And the Department of Justice filing charges on May 24, 2019 against “Wesley Blake Barber, 49, of Detroit, Michigan, the owner of Surgical Assistance Inc. and Medical Funding Consultants LLC, and Christopher Walker, M.D., 49, of Orlando, Florida, and owner of MedSurg Holdings LLC, in an indictment filed in the Eastern District of New York with one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, three counts of wire fraud, one count of conspiracy to violate the Travel Act and one count of violating the Travel Act.
5.      Gaslightingis used to manipulate Mesh Injured Plaintiff Clients, who are isolated, warned not to communicate anything to anyone about their lawsuit and easily abused by their own attorney because of their lack of knowledge of the law. Gaslighting is “a form of manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or members of a group, hoping to make targets question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, it attempts to destabilize the target and delegitimize the target’s belief.”
Usage: “Sociopaths and narcissists frequently use gaslighting tactics. Sociopaths consistently transgress social mores, break laws, and exploit others, but typically also are convincing liars, sometimes charming ones, who consistently deny wrongdoing.”
6.      Outright Theft of Plaintiffs Settlement Money by Attorneys Manipulation and Abuse of  Qualified Settlement Funds under IRS 468 B where there is no forensic accounting.
7.      Double dipping of cases. Are settlements paid by Defendants to Plaintiffs Attorneys, who don’t equitably distribute those IRS 468 B settlement funds to their own Plaintiff Clients, then placing the very same case on the docket again? QSF’s are ripe for Plaintiff Abuse.

It is a tragic state of affairs when trust is placed in the laws of the United States and in our Court System and in attorneys who violate their fiduciary duty to prey on innocent injured Plaintiff Clients. Fortunately some Attorneys are now filing legal malpractice lawsuits against those Attorneys exposing those who abused their very own Plaintiff Clients, in State and Federal
Court.                                                 
DISCLAIMER:
IF YOU RECEIVED THIS, PLEASE UNDERSTAND I RESPECT AND APPRECIATE THE HONEST PELVIC MESH PLAINTIFFS ATTORNEYS WHO FIGHT EVERY DAY FOR THEIR PLAINTIFF CLIENTS. NONE OF THIS IS DIRECTED AT THEM OR IN ANY WAY IS INTENDED TO INSULT THE HONEST PEOPLE WHO DEDICATE THEIR LIVES TO FIGHTING FOR THEIR CLIENTS.

The Good News is, not all Attorneys are corrupt 
or willfully blind to the 
massive disaster of the Pelvic Mesh MDL’s.



Thank you to:
LYNDA LANDERS
LANDERS LAW FIRM, McKINNEY, TX
JAMES MILLER BEGGS 
BEGGS LANDERS LAW FIRM PLLC, IRVING, TX

for prosecuting this case:
ALVARADO et al v. CLARK, LOVE & HUTSON, G.P. et al Case #: 4:19-cv-02148 

Texas Southern District Court    Judge: Andrew S Hanen       
Nature of Suit 370 Torts - Personal Property - Other Fraud
Cause 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Case Filed: Jun 13, 2019

Defendant
CLAYTON A. CLARK, 440 LOUISIANA STE 1600
HOUSTON, TX 77002
Defendant
CLARK, LOVE & HUTSON, G.P., 440 LOUISIANA STE 1600
HOUSTON, TX 77002
Defendant
CLAYTON A. CLARK, ESQ., PC, 440 LOUISIANA STE 1600
HOUSTON, TX 77002
Defendant
SHELLEY HUTSON, 440 LOUISIANA ST. SUITE 1600
HOUSTON, TX 77002
Defendant
HUTSON LAW FIRM, P.C., 440 LOUISIANA ST. SUITE 1600
HOUSTON, TX 77002
Defendant
JAMES LEE LAW FIRM, P.C., 743 WEST 18TH
HOUSTON, TX 77008
Defendant
LEE & MURPHY LAW FIRM, G.P., 743 WEST 18TH
HOUSTON, TX 77008
Defendant
JAMES LEE, JR., 440 LOISIANA ST., SUITE 900
HOUSTON, TX 77002                  
Defendant
SCOTT A. LOVE,  440 LOUISIANA SUITE 1600
HOUSTON, TX 77002
Defendant
ERIN MURPHY, 440 LOUISIANA ST., SUITE 300
HOUSTON, TX 77002
Defendant
SCOTT A. LOVE, PC, 440 LOUISIANA STREET SUITE 1600
HOUSTON, TX 77002

PLAINTIFFS
TAMMY ALVARADO, TAMMY HAGA,
CLARA REDMOND, AMY RUMINSKI
Represented By
JAMES MILLER BEGGS
BEGGS LANDERS LAW FIRM PLLC 


Ms. Landers and Mr. Beggs case is 
even bigger than the one in New Jersey below. 
Find it on the Pacer docket in the Southern District of Texas. 


Thank you to:
ADAM SLATER - MAZIE, SLATER, KATZ & FREEMAN LLC, ROSELAND, NJ

Mazie, Slater, Katz and Freeman LLC filed Master Case No.BER-L-11575-14 for lead plaintiff Debbie Gore and approximately 1,450 Proposed Class Members, a verified Class Action Complaint in the Superior court of New Jersey, Bergen County on June 10, 2019 before Judge Rachelle Harz.

It alleges legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment against all defendants for their actions in the Pelvic Mesh MDL in New Jersey against numerous law firms and attorneys at those law firms for mismanagement of the basics:
1.      Retainer agreements
2.      Attorney fees
3.      Expenses
4.      Improper sharing of Attorney Fees

Defendant Law Firms:
Nagel Rice, LLP, Roseland, New Jersey; The Potts Law Firm, Houston,Texas and Missouri;
Bailey Peavy Bailey Cowan Heckaman, Houston, Texas; Mesh Litigation Center, Houston, Texas; Steelman McAdams, Houston, Texas; Junell & Associates, Houston, Texas; Burnett Law Firm, Houston, Texas

Defendant Attorneys:
Bruce Nagel, Nagel Rice, LLP;  Robert Solomon, Nagel Rice, LLP; Andrew O’Connor, Nagel Rice, LLP; Derek Potts, The Potts Law Firm; Annie McAdams, Steelman McAdams

These Defendants are alleged to have violated New Jersey’s strict rules of the courts concerning fees and retainer agreements, such as:  
1.      Invalid Retainer Agreements because the defendants either has not signed agreements with local counsel in New Jersey or the women
2.      Attorney’s Fees of 40% which is over New Jersey limits of a firm’s percentage to 33.3%
3.      Improper Sharing of legal fees
4.      Deducting attorney’s fees off the top from the gross recovery while deducting expenses from the plaintiff’s portion of recovery which in effect stole money from the plaintiff
5.      Paying settlement dollars  to unauthorized recipient law firms
6.      Non-retained legal counsel making filings or appearances for plaintiffs
7.      Improper deduction of legal fees and/or expenses from plaintiffs

This is outrageous behavior of these Attorneys and their Law Firms, licensed Officers of the Court, who instead of prosecuting the lawsuits for their Plaintiffs, are simply preying on the Plaintiffs.

Please note:
This information is drawn from the original complaint filed in Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County. Errors or omissions are unintentional. Author would appreciate notification if any errors or omissions are noted.


Regards,
Lana C. Keeton
© 2005 – 2019 Lana C. Keeton All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Med Device Expert LLC
Legal Consultant . Expert Witness . Device Expert . Patient Advocate
901 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3-423, Miami Beach, FL 33139

FIGHTING UNEQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW



Facebook:  LANA KEETON  and  L.C. KEETON
Twitter:    @PlaintiffPower1

© 2005-2019 all rights reserved Lana C. Keeton

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed
901 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 3-423, Miami Beach, FL 33139
305.671.9331 phone  .  800.509.9917 fax  .  305.342.8002 cell phone