Wednesday, October 19, 2016
COLLUSION OR COINCIDENCE? PLAINTIFF ATTORNEYS PROTECTING THE SYSTEM, NOT THE PLAINTIFFS? ANTIQUATED ABDOMINAL SACRAL COLPOPEXY ATTACHING THE VAGINA TO THE SPINE WITH POLYPROPYLENE SURGICAL MESH PROTECTED IN A COURT OF LAW AND DOCTORS CAN NOT BE SUED FOR THE HARM THEY CAUSE WOMEN. HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
THE DECISION MAKERS and THE PAYEES - - - U.S. DISTRICT COURT for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA PTO 84 dated 08-26-2013 and PTO 207 dated 01-15-2016 COMMON BENEFITS FUND FEE & COST COMMITTEE (FCC) CONTACT INFO IS FROM THE PTO'S ON THE COURTS WEBSITE
THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF THE COMMON BENEFIT FUND BASED ON APPROXIMATELY 92,922 CASES THAT POTENTIALLY SETTLE FOR $40,000.00 EACH WILL BE $1.8 BILLION DOLLARS FOR THE WORK THE 18 HAVE DONE.
READ ALL THE WAY TO THE BOTTOM TO SEE THE 9 PEOPLE WHO DECIDE WHO GETS WHAT PORTION OF THAT MINIMUM $1.8 BILLION DOLLARS.
IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING, THE ATTORNEYS WHO DO THE WORK IN THE MDL'S ARE THE ONES BEING PAID FROM THE 5% COMMON BENEFIT FUND $1.8 BILLION DOLLAR MINIMUM.
THE OTHER 40% BEING WITHHELD FROM YOUR SETTLEMENT IS MOST LIKELY FOR YOUR ORIGINAL ATTORNEY FILING YOUR SHORT FORM COMPLAINT, AND NOT MUCH ELSE. AND PROBABLY ADVERTISING COSTS TO GET YOU TO FIND HIM AND SIGN UP WITH HIM.
AUGUST 26, 2013 THE MDL 2187 C.R. BARD 5% FUND WAS ESTABLISHED BY PTO 84 WHICH YOU CAN FIND ON THE WEST VIRGINIA COURT WEBSITE.
THE 9 PEOPLE BELOW ARE THE DECISION MAKERS AS TO WHO GETS PAID WHAT FROM THE 5% COMMON BENEFIT FUND BASED ON PT0 207, ALSO ON THE WEST VIRGINIA COURT WEBSITE. INTERESTING, HUH?
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Sunday, October 16, 2016
PLAINTIFFS SHOULD ATTEND MASS TORTS MADE PERFECT - LAS VEGAS - OCTOBER 19-21, 2016 - TO HEAR THEIR ATTORNEYS DISCUSS THEIR LAWSUITS
Special Needs Counsel and/or Elder Law Attorneys should be hired to assist the plaintiffs, not just sent a letter, take it or leave it (the settlement).Plaintiffs are not professionals and depend on the guidance of their attorneys. The relationship between plaintiff and attorney becomes adversarial because of neglect of the plaintiff during intake and during the settlement process.
Plaintiffs should be equipped with ALL the facts so they will be able to make an informed decision. Do I file a lawsuit? Do I accept the settlement? What are my options? Plaintiff's needs are not well served by the current system.
From injury to case settled is a very long journey for plaintiffs and there should be some true assistance to them in coping with the realities of a long legal battle.
PLAINTIFFS DO NOT HAVE LEGAL SKILLS and ARE DEPENDENT on their ATTORNEY'S REPRESENTATIONS to MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS.
PLAINTIFF'S ARE NOT INFORMED! And some are now dead.
Linda Batiste is dead.
Joan Budke is dead.
Joy Poteet is dead.
They did not survive the long legal process but their legal cases have continued.
Thursday, October 6, 2016
PTO 237 ETHICON MDL 2327 = SETTLEMENT ESCROW = QUALIFIED SETTLEMENT = SECTION 468B of the INTERNAL REVENUE CODE of 1986
ARE YOU A MESH PLAINTIFF AGAINST JOHNSON & JOHNSON - ETHICON IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MULTI DISTRICT LITIGATION CASE 02327?
ARE YOU ONE OF THE 999 (?) WOMEN SHARING THE $112 (?) MILLION DOLLAR QUALIFIED SETTLEMENT FUND CONTROLLED BY BLASINGAME, BURCH, GARRARD AND ASHLEY?
WANT TO KNOW THE ADVANTAGES OF THE ETHICON QUALIFIED SETTLEMENT FUND CREATED SEPTEMBER 8, 2016 FOR YOU?
DON'T GET EXCITED.....
WHILE BBGBA LEGALLY PAYS THEMSELVES IMMEDIATELY THEIR 40% (?) FEE = $44.8 MILLION DOLLARS of the $112 (?) MILLION UNDER SECTION 468B of the INTERNAL REVENUE CODE of 1986 and ARE ELIGIBLE TO BE PAID THEIR PORTION (?) OF THE 5% ($5.6 MILLION), COMMON BENEFITS FUND YOUR ADVANTAGES ARE LISTED BELOW...
4th below "THE PLAINTIFF'S CAN TAKE THEIR TIME" and
Finally below "TIME IS NO LONGER A PRESSING ISSUE."
JOHNSON & JOHNSON - ETHICON WILL DEDUCT THE $112 MILLION CLAIM EXPENSE FROM THEIR BOOKS IMMEDIATELY and AS IT ELOQUENTLY SAYS BELOW
First "THEY CAN PAY AND WALK".
WANT TO READ ALL BACKGROUND INFO ON THE CUT & PASTE BELOW....CLICK THIS LINK: http://www.kearnsandkearns.com/news/articles/26-why-trial-lawyers-should-use-s468b-settlement.html
Advantages of the §468B Settlement Funds
CLICK THIS LINK TO SEE ENTIRE AGREEMENT BETWEEN JOHNSON & JOHNSON - ETHICON and BLASINGAME, BURCH, GARRARD & ASHLEY from the COURT WEBSITE:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
(Order Re: Qualified Settlement Fund-Ethicon & Blasingame, Burch, Garrard & Ashley P.C.)
Blasingame, Burch, Garrard & Ashley, P.C. (“BBGA”), as counsel for certain plaintiffs in this MDL No. 2327 has moved the Court for entry of an Order to aid in the efficient processing and administration of a Confidential Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) between Defendant Ethicon, Inc. and its parent and subsidiary companies (“Ethicon”) and BBGA to resolve the claims of certain claimants against Ethicon relating to the implant of Ethicon Pelvic Mesh Products (as defined in the Settlement Agreement). [ECF No. 2733].
(2) retaining continuing jurisdiction and supervision over the Settlement Escrow, and
(3) determining that the Settlement Escrow constitutes a “qualified settlement fund” within the meaning of section 468B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and Treasury Regulation sections 1.468B-1, et. seq.
4) The appointment of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association to serve as the escrow agent (“Escrow Agent”) pursuant to the Escrow Agreement is approved. The Escrow Agent shall administer the Settlement Escrow in accordance with the terms of the Escrow Agreement.