Saturday, February 23, 2013
J&J DISCLOSES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATIONS OF METAL ON METAL HIP IMPLANTS AND SYNTHETIC SURGICAL MESH FOR HERNIA AND UROGYNECOLOGIC REPAIRS
Potential criminal activities of Johnson & Johnson are being reported by Bloomberg relating to synthetic surgical mesh and metal hip implants. Sadly, this will not bring back the lives of hundreds of thousands who are already harmed.
Myself and other patient advocates have been feeding information to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Office of Criminal Investigation (OCI) of the U.S. Food and Drug Adminsitration (FDA) and anyone else who would listen for several years now. They can't get the horse back in the barn now!!
Praise God the truth is going to be told. Please send this to everyone you know. You may just save a life from being ruined! Thank you for getting the news out there!
We have to protect each other because it is obvious some Pharmaceutical Companies have defrauded the FDA, Doctors, Hospitals and the American Public!
God bless America!! Yours truly, Lana C. Keeton
J&J Discloses Government Investigations of Hip (Implants), (Synthetic Surgical) Mesh
By David Voreacos - Feb 22, 2013 8:35 AM ET
http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf/2013/02/johnson_johnson_discloses_gove.html
(CUT & PASTE FROM BLOOMBERG BELOW)
"Johnson & Johnson disclosed government probes into two of its troubled products today."
"Johnson & Johnson, the world’s largest seller of health-care products, disclosed separate government investigations into possible false claims related to its hip devices and the marketing of its surgical mesh.
The U.S. Justice Department requested documents relating to whether J&J’s DePuy unit may have submitted false claims to federal health-care programs over its ASR XL hip devices, which were recalled in August 2010, the company said today in a regulatory filing. California is leading a multistate investigation into the marketing of surgical mesh, J&J said.
J&J, based in New Brunswick, New Jersey, said it’s “fully cooperating” with the Justice Department’s civil division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Massachusetts after getting an informal request in August about the marketing and use of the hips.
“The government is investigating whether any person or entity submitted or caused to be submitted false claims or false statements affecting federal health-care programs in connection with the marketing and use of the ASR XL hip device,” according to the filing. “The government has since made additional informal requests for the production of documents.”
10,000 ASR Metal on Metal Hip Implant Lawsuits
More than 10,000 lawsuits are pending in the U.S. over the ASR hips, which claim J&J defectively designed the device and failed to warn of possible problems. J&J recalled 93,000 worldwide after saying 12 percent failed in the U.K. The first lawsuit to go to trial is under way in state court in Los Angeles.
California’s attorney general contacted J&J in October regarding a probe of the marketing of mesh products for hernia and urogynecological purposes, J&J said. That probe involves 42 states, the company said.
J&J faces at least 1,800 lawsuits over its Gynecare Prolift vaginal mesh implant used to shore up pelvic muscles. The first of those cases has gone to trial in state court in Atlantic City, New Jersey, where a jury will enter its fourth day of deliberations today.
In August, J&J stopped selling four mesh devices in the U.S., including Prolift. The company said in June that it would end sales worldwide because of the products’ lack of commercial viability, and not based on their safety and effectiveness.
The cases are Kransky v. DePuy, BC456086, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County (Los Angeles); and Gross v. Gynecare Inc., Atl-L-6966-10, Superior Court of Atlantic County, New Jersey (Atlantic City)."
Friday, February 22, 2013
LINDA GROSS VS. ETHICON INC. NEW JERSEY TRANSVAGINAL MESH TRIAL: WAS THIS A PRODUCT LIABILITY LAWSUIT?
I personally believe Linda Gross did not have adequate representation. Why, you ask?
The trial ended with testimony by Dr. Kaveler discussing surgical procedure. This is a product liability lawsuit. Why did Mazie Katz allow the very last testimony heard by the jury to be about surgical procedure?
A few simple rebuttals would have helped. Like asking the jury, "If you had a splinter in your finger, what would you do? Would you get pain management for a splinter? No. Would you get physical therapy for a splinter? No."
It is such a simple example of how Linda Gross is suffering. She feels like she has hundreds of splinters in her pelvis. No one in their right mind would leave a splinter in their finger, get pain management, physical therapy or go to a psychiatrist. You would GET IT OUT!
Yet the jury is left with the thought, "Why did she not just leave the mesh implanted in her pelvis? Why did she insist the mesh be removed?" by her own attorneys who allowed the testimony to rely heavily on testimony about surgical procedures, how many were there, who recommended them, who did them, did the doctor recommend them or did Linda Gross ask for them. WHAT?
Or did Mazie Katz present the simple thought....surgically removing mesh from your body is like cutting gum out of your hair. No I did not hear that one either. Maybe then the jury would have better understood the pain and agony of each and every mesh removal surgery Linda Gross has endured.
Believe me, if you had mesh in your pelvis, as I have for over 11 years, you will undergo whatever surgery it takes to get the mesh out. I suffer, certainly not to the extent Linda Gross does, and I KNOW how she feels about getting it out. Mesh pain is pure torture.
MY BIG QUESTION:
Where was the testimony about the inherent defects of the Prolift Gynemesh implanted in Linda Gross?
Did her attorneys Mazie, Katz, Slater & Freeman discredit the synthetic surgical mesh product itself during the trial?
I DON'T THINK SO.
What I saw:
1) attack of the ethics of Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson - sure it showed the seeming fraud by Ethicon in not getting the product cleared by the FDA before actually selling the Prolift product
2) failure to warn the doctor
3) fraud and misrepresentation
What I did not see: Evidence presented by Mazie, Katz of the inherent defects of the physical and chemical properties of Prolift Gynemesh polymer itself, that it degrades, decomposes and moves within the body at will.
Oh, there was some discussion of the pore size, the strain placed on Prolift in the pelvis and the placement of the Gynemesh in the pelvis when it had historically been placed for hernia repair in the abdomen.
The case put on by Mazie, Katz, Slater & Freeman gives Gynecare, Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson free reign to continue to sell their Gynemesh product by simply changing their "Instructions for Use" (IFU) and re-submitting them to the FDA/CDRH for clearance......WHICH THEY HAVE ALREADY DONE.
Ethicon no longer sells Prolift, TVT Secur, Prolift M, etc. They have been removed from the market.
THIS IN NO WAY MEANS ETHICON WILL NOT CONTINUE TO HARM THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF OTHER WOMEN BY RE-PACKAGING AND RE-MARKETING THE VERY SAME DEFECTIVE SYNTHETIC SURGICAL MESH...GYNEMESH!
So there are lots of cheers and support of Mazie, Katz and all the other law firms involved in the pelvic mesh lawsuits in New Jersey.
A word of caution: this is "product liability prosecution light". The company lives to "die another day".
Last but not least. One has to wonder why a law firm such as Mazie, Katz, Slater & Freeman, a relatively small law firm, took on prosecution of an industry giant, a multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical company that annually makes BILLIONS of dollars in profit when they had never before been involved in a class action or mass tort. Belongs in the DMS (doesn't make sense) file to me.
Or maybe not when you realize punitive damages are capped at 5 times compensatory damages or $350,000.00, whichever is greater, in the state of New Jersey protecting Gynecare/Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson from potentially millions and millions more dollars of liability than if it were tried in another state.
And Mazie Katz only had 85 cases when they originally filed their first cases after years of running their "mesh complications" website ad all over the internet AND anywhere you see my name?
Or that they use "truth in medicine" as a tag for their website.
Advertise the hell out of your lawsuit against J&J, but take as few cases as possible.
Seriously limits the overall monetary liability of J&J by reducing the number of cases and having a cap on punitive damages. Sweet deal for J&J but why Mazie, Katz involvment?
Been thinking about this for over 4 years since October 2008 when Matthew Mendelshon contacted me from Mazie Katz and set up a conference call with Adam Slater to potentially hire me as a legal consultant.
I know now hiring me was not the intent of the conversation. Adam Slater ask me "Are there a lot of these injuries out there?" I answered a resounding "Yes".
THE VERY NEXT DAY their "mesh complications" website went online and everywhere you see my name, there's a Mazie Katz ad.
Now think about the trial testimony. 2008 is when the FDA/CDRH finally knew the Prolift was being marketed without clearance. Ethicon knew the cat was out of the bag. Coincidence Mazie Katz contacted me in the fall of 2008? Maybe.
But knowing there are hundreds of thousands of pelvic organ prolapse mesh kits implanted in women every single year, how is it Mazie Katz wound up with only 85 cases after years of their online advertising?
Like I said, belongs in the DMS (doesn't make sense) file. I report, you decide.
The trial ended with testimony by Dr. Kaveler discussing surgical procedure. This is a product liability lawsuit. Why did Mazie Katz allow the very last testimony heard by the jury to be about surgical procedure?
A few simple rebuttals would have helped. Like asking the jury, "If you had a splinter in your finger, what would you do? Would you get pain management for a splinter? No. Would you get physical therapy for a splinter? No."
It is such a simple example of how Linda Gross is suffering. She feels like she has hundreds of splinters in her pelvis. No one in their right mind would leave a splinter in their finger, get pain management, physical therapy or go to a psychiatrist. You would GET IT OUT!
Yet the jury is left with the thought, "Why did she not just leave the mesh implanted in her pelvis? Why did she insist the mesh be removed?" by her own attorneys who allowed the testimony to rely heavily on testimony about surgical procedures, how many were there, who recommended them, who did them, did the doctor recommend them or did Linda Gross ask for them. WHAT?
Or did Mazie Katz present the simple thought....surgically removing mesh from your body is like cutting gum out of your hair. No I did not hear that one either. Maybe then the jury would have better understood the pain and agony of each and every mesh removal surgery Linda Gross has endured.
Believe me, if you had mesh in your pelvis, as I have for over 11 years, you will undergo whatever surgery it takes to get the mesh out. I suffer, certainly not to the extent Linda Gross does, and I KNOW how she feels about getting it out. Mesh pain is pure torture.
MY BIG QUESTION:
Where was the testimony about the inherent defects of the Prolift Gynemesh implanted in Linda Gross?
Did her attorneys Mazie, Katz, Slater & Freeman discredit the synthetic surgical mesh product itself during the trial?
I DON'T THINK SO.
What I saw:
1) attack of the ethics of Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson - sure it showed the seeming fraud by Ethicon in not getting the product cleared by the FDA before actually selling the Prolift product
2) failure to warn the doctor
3) fraud and misrepresentation
What I did not see: Evidence presented by Mazie, Katz of the inherent defects of the physical and chemical properties of Prolift Gynemesh polymer itself, that it degrades, decomposes and moves within the body at will.
Oh, there was some discussion of the pore size, the strain placed on Prolift in the pelvis and the placement of the Gynemesh in the pelvis when it had historically been placed for hernia repair in the abdomen.
The case put on by Mazie, Katz, Slater & Freeman gives Gynecare, Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson free reign to continue to sell their Gynemesh product by simply changing their "Instructions for Use" (IFU) and re-submitting them to the FDA/CDRH for clearance......WHICH THEY HAVE ALREADY DONE.
Ethicon no longer sells Prolift, TVT Secur, Prolift M, etc. They have been removed from the market.
THIS IN NO WAY MEANS ETHICON WILL NOT CONTINUE TO HARM THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF OTHER WOMEN BY RE-PACKAGING AND RE-MARKETING THE VERY SAME DEFECTIVE SYNTHETIC SURGICAL MESH...GYNEMESH!
So there are lots of cheers and support of Mazie, Katz and all the other law firms involved in the pelvic mesh lawsuits in New Jersey.
A word of caution: this is "product liability prosecution light". The company lives to "die another day".
Last but not least. One has to wonder why a law firm such as Mazie, Katz, Slater & Freeman, a relatively small law firm, took on prosecution of an industry giant, a multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical company that annually makes BILLIONS of dollars in profit when they had never before been involved in a class action or mass tort. Belongs in the DMS (doesn't make sense) file to me.
Or maybe not when you realize punitive damages are capped at 5 times compensatory damages or $350,000.00, whichever is greater, in the state of New Jersey protecting Gynecare/Ethicon/Johnson & Johnson from potentially millions and millions more dollars of liability than if it were tried in another state.
And Mazie Katz only had 85 cases when they originally filed their first cases after years of running their "mesh complications" website ad all over the internet AND anywhere you see my name?
Or that they use "truth in medicine" as a tag for their website.
Advertise the hell out of your lawsuit against J&J, but take as few cases as possible.
Seriously limits the overall monetary liability of J&J by reducing the number of cases and having a cap on punitive damages. Sweet deal for J&J but why Mazie, Katz involvment?
Been thinking about this for over 4 years since October 2008 when Matthew Mendelshon contacted me from Mazie Katz and set up a conference call with Adam Slater to potentially hire me as a legal consultant.
I know now hiring me was not the intent of the conversation. Adam Slater ask me "Are there a lot of these injuries out there?" I answered a resounding "Yes".
THE VERY NEXT DAY their "mesh complications" website went online and everywhere you see my name, there's a Mazie Katz ad.
Now think about the trial testimony. 2008 is when the FDA/CDRH finally knew the Prolift was being marketed without clearance. Ethicon knew the cat was out of the bag. Coincidence Mazie Katz contacted me in the fall of 2008? Maybe.
But knowing there are hundreds of thousands of pelvic organ prolapse mesh kits implanted in women every single year, how is it Mazie Katz wound up with only 85 cases after years of their online advertising?
Like I said, belongs in the DMS (doesn't make sense) file. I report, you decide.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
LINDA GROSS VS. ETHICON INC NEW JERSEY TRANSVAGINAL MESH TRIAL
JOHNSON & JOHNSON,
ETHICON INC and
GYNECARE...
and their EXTREMELY DISGUSTING HUMANS:
Christy Jones, the despicable attorney
Dr. Miles Murphy and Dr. Vincent Lucente, the despicable duo
Dr. James Raders and Dr. Ralph Zipper, another despicable duo
Dr. Charlotte Owens, a traitor to women
Dr. Elizabeth Kaveler, another traitor to women
As they bow down before their "Surgical Mesh God, the mighty Prolift" a filthy piece of petroleum waste byproduct that tortures humans they have deceived with their tales of salvation from pelvic organ prolapse, they are a disgrace to the human race.
I read about their lies on the witness stand as they testify against an innocent trusting woman, Linda Gross, and the following verse comes to mind.
Revelation 21:8 King James Version (KJV)
8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
I am in disbelief that such a culture of lies, corruption and deceit includes so many "humans".
How is it possible there are so many of them in one company who conspire together knowing they will cause so much harm to other people? Never do they say there will be NO HARM, Only how low the percentage of people they KNOW THEY WILL HARM!
THIS IS CRIMINAL@! And they have no qualms whatsoever as they, one by one, lie and lie and lie!
GOD WILL BE THEIR JUDGE!
ETHICON INC and
GYNECARE...
and their EXTREMELY DISGUSTING HUMANS:
Christy Jones, the despicable attorney
Dr. Miles Murphy and Dr. Vincent Lucente, the despicable duo
Dr. James Raders and Dr. Ralph Zipper, another despicable duo
Dr. Charlotte Owens, a traitor to women
Dr. Elizabeth Kaveler, another traitor to women
As they bow down before their "Surgical Mesh God, the mighty Prolift" a filthy piece of petroleum waste byproduct that tortures humans they have deceived with their tales of salvation from pelvic organ prolapse, they are a disgrace to the human race.
I read about their lies on the witness stand as they testify against an innocent trusting woman, Linda Gross, and the following verse comes to mind.
Revelation 21:8 King James Version (KJV)
8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
I am in disbelief that such a culture of lies, corruption and deceit includes so many "humans".
How is it possible there are so many of them in one company who conspire together knowing they will cause so much harm to other people? Never do they say there will be NO HARM, Only how low the percentage of people they KNOW THEY WILL HARM!
THIS IS CRIMINAL@! And they have no qualms whatsoever as they, one by one, lie and lie and lie!
GOD WILL BE THEIR JUDGE!
Friday, February 1, 2013
TRANSVAGINAL or HERNIA MESH ATTORNEY NOT REPRESENTING YOU PROPERLY, FILE A GRIEVANCE WITH THE STATE BAR ASSOCIATION!
Hello Fellow Mesh Injured Patients,
Not getting proper representation by your transvaginal or hernia mesh attorney? No contact for months, not updates? File a griievance with the State Bar in your state.
If you are having big issues with representation by your attorney, there are ways to get help. Every state has a professional code of conduct for lawyers they have to follow. If they don't, the State Bar Association has the power to take away their ability to practice law by taking away their bar card.
Call information or look it up online to get the phone number of your State Bar Association. Call them and ask them to mail you the form to file your grievance.
Be sure to find and read the professional code of conduct before filing the grievance to be sure you actually have a grievance.
It is a very effective way to make sure your rights are not being violated.
Best, Lana
Not getting proper representation by your transvaginal or hernia mesh attorney? No contact for months, not updates? File a griievance with the State Bar in your state.
If you are having big issues with representation by your attorney, there are ways to get help. Every state has a professional code of conduct for lawyers they have to follow. If they don't, the State Bar Association has the power to take away their ability to practice law by taking away their bar card.
Call information or look it up online to get the phone number of your State Bar Association. Call them and ask them to mail you the form to file your grievance.
Be sure to find and read the professional code of conduct before filing the grievance to be sure you actually have a grievance.
It is a very effective way to make sure your rights are not being violated.
Best, Lana
Sunday, January 27, 2013
LET'S TALK! JOIN MEDICALMESHTALK.COM
LET'S TALK! JOIN WWW.MEDICALMESHTALK.COM
Learn how to stop the recurring mesh infections.
Read Commentary on the GROSS V. ETHICON New Jersey trial, what they are and are not proving!
How to hire an attorney...legal checklist as a benefit of membership! Know the right questions!
Monthly Conference Calls with guest legal and/or medical professionals.
We look forward to seeing you!
JOIN YOUR MESHIE FREINDS!
Best, blessings, Lana
Learn how to stop the recurring mesh infections.
Read Commentary on the GROSS V. ETHICON New Jersey trial, what they are and are not proving!
How to hire an attorney...legal checklist as a benefit of membership! Know the right questions!
Monthly Conference Calls with guest legal and/or medical professionals.
We look forward to seeing you!
JOIN YOUR MESHIE FREINDS!
Best, blessings, Lana
LANA KEETON SPEAKING ENGAGMENTS 2013
LANA KEETON IS GUEST LECTURER AT
OSHER LIFE LONG LEARNING INSTITUTE
UT QUEST PROGRAM – UNIV OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN
TUESDAY - JANUARY 29, 2013 - UT CAMPUS
"THINK YOU'RE PROTECTED? YOU'RE NOT! WHAT DOCTORS DON'T KNOW AND THE FDA IS NOT TELLING YOU!" ©
By Lana C. Keeton
Americans go to doctors, whom they trust, who perform surgery on them in accredited hospitals using FDA “approved” products. They believe in the system. Americans don’t ask questions. They trust a system that actually betrays them...Lana Keeton whose journey as a surgical mesh injured patient led her to become a patient advocate, a legal consultant and a voice for those thousands of injured patients at the FDA, on Capitol Hill and in America's healthcare system. Coordinator Jane Howerton
"SELLING SICKNESS" 2013 'PEOPLE BEFORE PROFITS' WEDNESDAY - FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 20-22, 2013, WASHINGTON, D.C.
Panelist on "Grief to Action". Headed by author Rosemary Gibson. How I took my own experience with the horrors of mesh and turned it into a patient advocacy organization, Truth in Medicine Incorporated, to help others.
Mine will be more "Anger to Action" based on the doctor implanting a permanent medical device without my knowledge or consent.
This conference will bring together academic medical reformers, consumer activists, and health journalists to examine the current scope of disease mongering and to develop strategies and coalitions for change. Topics will include misleading marketing, journalistic standards, over-treatment, over-diagnosis, whistleblowers, new roles for advocates, pharmacovigilance, clinical trials, activist narratives, new conflict of interest areas, evidence-based screening, igniting citizen outrage, and more. We will have plenary roundtables, panels, workshops, a unique Good News Exhibit Hall, and Booktivism training. Students and young activists are welcome!
http://sellingsickness.com/
February 20-22, 2013
Hyatt Regency Washington on Capitol Hill
Washington D.C.
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI/FLORIDA BIOETHICS CONFERENCE- FRIDAY . APRIL 5, 2013 . MIAMI MARRIOTT BISCAYNE BAY - MIAMI, FLORIDA
It is with great pride, I am an invited speaker at the 2013 UM Bioethics Conference. Ken Goodman, PhD, and Robin Fiore, PhD, head up the University of Miami Bio-Ethics Programs having a direct impact every day on future doctors. I highly respect their work.
“It is a professional conference attracting physicians, nurses, health law practitioners, clergy, social workers, public health staff and hospital administrators. This is a terrific opportunity to speak to the decision makers and the actual health care practitioners who influence health care every day and have the chance to influence their thinking in regard to patient safety.
In 2012, they celebrated the 20th anniversary of the Florida Bioethics Network and the largest sustained professional bioethics conference in the US, one that regularly draws 300 or more in attendance.”
“Kenneth W. Goodman, Ph.D.FACMI, is founder and director of the University of Miami Bioethics Program and its Pan American Bioethics Initiative and co-director of the university’s Ethics Programs, including its Business Ethics Program. The Ethics Programs have recently been designated a World Health Organization Collaborating Center in Ethics and Global Health Policy, one of six in the world and the only one in the United States.”
Monday, January 21, 2013
"DR. MESH" JOHN MIKLOS: EXPERT FOR THE PLAINTIFF?
I met +Dr. John Miklos in September 2002 after being referred to him by another doctor planning surgery on me to deal with the massive internal and external abdominal scars from necrotizing fasciitis, the result of a hysterectomy and bladder suspension in December 2001.
Little did I know I was face to face with DR. MESH who was teaching doctors across the United States, and later in other countries, to do the same procedure to thousands of other women.
Little did I know he worked for multiple drug and device companies doing "clinical trials" and "clinical studies".
Little did I know I would later come in contact with many women who also had consulted with DR. MESH Miklos.
His "mesh" journey started when Ethicon paid his way, along with other U.S. surgeons, to Sweden in September 1998 to learn the Transvaginal Tape procedure from Dr. Ulf Ulmsten using the Gynecare TVT Prolene (polypropylene) bladder suspension sling.
While stopping along the way to promote "Vaginal Rejuvenation", the Johnny Appleseed of mesh has caused untold harm to thousands and thousands of women implanted with various transvaginal mesh kits and bladder sling kits by promoting mesh to other doctors.
Hundreds of thousands of dollars in his pocket later, DR. MESH is still raking in the dough, this time as "Expert Witness" for the plaintiffs. It is such a mockery of the plaintiffs and of the legal system to think someone who has caused so much misery to so many thousands of women should now be on the plaintiff's side.
I personally think DR. MESH Miklos is a mole for the device makers, learning the plaintiff's strategy in all the transvagiNal lawsuits and then handing over the info to the device makers.
Oh, did I mention he falsified my medical records and then later admitted it in sworn deposition testimony?
There's lots more, but let's not talk about it here.
Come on over to www.medicalmeshtalk.com to hear the rest.
Little did I know I was face to face with DR. MESH who was teaching doctors across the United States, and later in other countries, to do the same procedure to thousands of other women.
Little did I know he worked for multiple drug and device companies doing "clinical trials" and "clinical studies".
Little did I know I would later come in contact with many women who also had consulted with DR. MESH Miklos.
His "mesh" journey started when Ethicon paid his way, along with other U.S. surgeons, to Sweden in September 1998 to learn the Transvaginal Tape procedure from Dr. Ulf Ulmsten using the Gynecare TVT Prolene (polypropylene) bladder suspension sling.
While stopping along the way to promote "Vaginal Rejuvenation", the Johnny Appleseed of mesh has caused untold harm to thousands and thousands of women implanted with various transvaginal mesh kits and bladder sling kits by promoting mesh to other doctors.
Hundreds of thousands of dollars in his pocket later, DR. MESH is still raking in the dough, this time as "Expert Witness" for the plaintiffs. It is such a mockery of the plaintiffs and of the legal system to think someone who has caused so much misery to so many thousands of women should now be on the plaintiff's side.
I personally think DR. MESH Miklos is a mole for the device makers, learning the plaintiff's strategy in all the transvagiNal lawsuits and then handing over the info to the device makers.
Oh, did I mention he falsified my medical records and then later admitted it in sworn deposition testimony?
There's lots more, but let's not talk about it here.
Come on over to www.medicalmeshtalk.com to hear the rest.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
